REPORT FOR 1 899. 
601 
Rubiis t?itegribasis, P. J. Muell. ? West Cliff, Bournemouth, S. 
Hants, 22nd and 27th June 1899. This is the plant for which Dr. 
Focke, after seeing it growing abundantly in the Bournemouth 
neighbourhood, suggested this name in ‘Journ. Bot.,’ 1890, p. 100. 
But it is still only provisionally thus named, as I have seen no con- 
tinental specimens. — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. integribasis, P. J. Muell. Larkton Hills, Cheshire, 27th July 
1899. Named for me in 1894 by Rev. W. M. Rogers, and confirmed 
by Dr. Focke ; but I suppose it should only reckon as “a small 
form.” — A. H. Wolley-Dod. 
R. erythrinus, Genev. Wyre banks, Preesall, W. Lancs., 7th 
September 1899. — J. A. Wheldon. “Apparently correct.” — W. M. 
Rogers. 
R. erythrinus, Genev., ioxmd. glatidulosa. See ‘Report,’ 1897, p. 542. 
Parkside, Wimbledon Common, Surrey, in great quantity, 25th July 
1899. Seen also on Barnes and Wandsworth Commons. — W. Moyle 
Rogers. 
R. Bakeri, F. A. Lees. ‘ B. R. C. Rep.,’ 1884, p. 120. ‘Engl. 
Bot. Suppl.,’ 3rd ed., p. 78. Wimbledon Common and Putney Fleath, 
Surrey, in great quantity, 15th July 1899. Seen also in plenty on 
Barnes and Wandsworth Commons, and near O.xshott, in the same 
county. A very floriferous small-leaved form, intermediate between 
R. rhamnifoliiis and R. nef?ioralis. — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. nemoralis, P. J. Muel., var. Silurum^ A. Ley. Abundant about 
Llandrindod Wells, Radnorshire, ascending to 1000 ft., 7th and 27th 
July 1899. — H. Painter. 
R. pulcherrimus, Neum. Between Morecambe and Snatchems, W. 
Lancs., 24th July 1899.— J. A. Wheldon. “ Yes ; not yet known for 
S. Lancs.” — W. M. Rogers. 
R. mercicus^ var. bracteatus^ Bagnall. Near Walton, August 1899; 
Thornton, S. Lancs., 23rd September 1899. The original Lancashire 
station for this having been destroyed, it is interesting to record it 
again from another Walton locality, and also from Thornton. — J. A. 
Wheldon. On the Thornton specimens Mr. Rogers writes: — “I dare 
not confirm this name without seeing floivering panicles. It may be 
right; but these late-gathered pieces recall R. pulcherrimus to a degree 
not observable in Mr. ^Vheldon’s 1894 specimens, which are annotated 
in the ‘ Report ’ for that year.” 
R. ca/vatus, Blox. Netherton, S. Lancs., 17th September 1899. — 
J. A. Wheldon. “Correct.” — W. R. L. 
R. calvatus, Blox., small form. Shirley, Derbyshire, 14th August 
1891. P'his plant occurs in several places in this neighbourhood ; it 
is uniformly smaller in habit and foliage than calvatus^ and is inter- 
