358 THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
glandular hairs are.” “Var. glutinosa, but not extreme.” — E. S. 
Marshall. “Typical serpyllifolia." — J. G. Baker. “A stifif state 
with somewhat rigid pedicels only.” — Arthur Bennett. “A form with 
glandular sepals, but not var. LloydiiP — W. R. Linton. 
Arenaria serpyllifolia^ L. var. glutinosa^ Koch. St. Helen’s Spit, and 
summit of cliff towards Needles, Isle of Wight, 20th July, 1892. — A. H. 
Wolley-Dod. “ It is a connecting link between eu-serpyllifolia and 
LloydiiP — J. G. Baker. “Seems correct.” — Arthur Bennett. “A 
rather common form of the sandy coast of S. England.” — E. S. 
Marshall. 
A. serpyllifolia^ L. var. macrocarpa^ Lloyd = ^. Lloydii^ Jord. Sum- 
mit of cliff towards Needles, Isle of Wight, 20th July, 1892. — A. H. 
W’oLLEY-1 )0D, who says “these plants, and those in preceding packet, were 
growing together on the broken ground at the top of the cliff. They 
appear to differ from them only in the absence of glands, the latter 
being only developed on the plants which grew on the barren spots, 
which would rather indicate that one is a state of the other. Mr, 
Beeby thinks that they should be named as above. As the variety is 
said to be eglandulous, I have named the glandular one var. glutinosa, 
Koch.” “ Good Lioydii. I have found this and gluiinosa growing 
together in Kent.” — E. S. Marshall. “Differs from authentic Cher- 
bourg examples by the longer internodes, the nerves of the sepals less 
prominent, and the hairs of the leaves more numerous, and without 
the transparent ones along the leaf base, and in being much less 
tufted. Mr. Idoyd’s plant has much the growth of the compact forms 
of A. ciliata, the very numerous lower leaves densely crowded, and 
the numerous branches at the apex of the root.” — Arthur Bennett. 
“ Capt Wolley-Dod’s Arenarice are interesting. His var. Lioydii 
really seems that plant (judging from the description), but I should 
call his glutinosa nearer to leptoclados^ and I do not see what there is to 
keep his ^ serpyllifolia, var.,’ from typical serpyllifoliaP — W. Moyle 
Rogers. A. Lioydii, Jord. ‘ Pugill pi. Nov.’ (1852), p. 37, = A. 
serpyllifolia, L., var. macrocarpa, ‘Lloyd, FI, Loir. Inf.,’ p. 42, is 
figured in Willkomm’s ‘ leones,’ p. 37, and described on p. 95. 
“ Species proxima quidem A. serpyllifolise sed ab ea cyma abbreviata, 
sepalis insequalibus exterioribus ovatis multo latioribus quinquenerviis 
neque lanceolatis acutissimis trinerviis, pilis nervorum incurvato- 
adscendentibus neque erecto-patulis, antheris purpureis et seminibus 
majoribus obtuse neque acute tuberculatis bene distincta est.” On 
the plant from the Isle of Wight, near the Needles, the sepals were 
not seven-nerved in the three specimens I examined, but only five- 
nerved, nor were the sepals so obovate as in the figure cited, 
resembling as they did the figure given there of serpyllifolia. — G. C. 
Druce. “This is A. serpyllifolia, var. scabra, Fenzl.” — Dr. Lange. 
Sagina apetala, Linn. var. Railway platform, Great Malvern, 
Worcester, 8th August, 1892, J. H. A. Steuart, who says Mr. Arth. 
Bennett coincided in thus naming it. “ Surely ciliata, the sepals are 
not patent in fruit.”- — E. S. Marshall. “ I think a ciliata form.” — J. 
G. Baker. “A. apetala, Linn., var. prostrata, Bab.” — W. R, Linton. 
“ The Sagina is not S. ciliata, nor A. apetala, but if not a new species 
