364 THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
1892. — W, H. Painter. Woburn Sands, September, 1892, Bucks. — 
E. F. Linton. New County Record. 
Rubus Sch/echtendalii, Weihe. Boar’s Hill, Berks, Sep., 189.2. — G. 
C. Druce. 
R. villicaulis, Koehl. Field between Cromer and Runton, East 
Norfolk, 20th July, 1891. Not recorded for Vice-county 27 in 
‘Topographical Botany,’ ed. ii., p. 140. — Charles Bailey. 
R. adsdius, Genev. = R. micans^ Godr. Penselwood, Somerset, 
August, 1891. — R. P. Murray. Mounton, Monmouth, October, 
1891, and 8th September, 1892. — W. A. Shoolbred. 
R. gnitus^ Focke. Gowerton to Penclawydd, Glamorgan, 18th 
Aug., 1892. — E. F. Linton. 
R. leucandriis, Focke. Bailie Gate, Dorset, July, 1890, and 
Piddle Wood, Dorset, 24th August, 1891 — R. P. Murray. 
R. amplificatus, Lees. Near Shirley, S. Derbyshire, Sept, 1892. 
Mr. Rogers confirms, remarking that it differs from the type in the 
more than usually aciculate panicle and rounded terminal leaflet. — 
W. R. Linton. 
R. Devoniensis^ Focke. Near Bangor, August, 1892. — J. E. 
Griffith. “ I hear from Mr. Griffith that this plant was named 
R. Devoniensis by Dr. Focke. It seems to me, however, to be at 
least as near R. amplificatus, Lees, as to Mr. Briggs’ Devon specimens 
of Devoniensis^ of which I have a good series and have seen more at 
Cambridge.” — W. M. Rogers. 
R. Boreanus, G. Genev. ‘ Monographie des Rubus,’ &c., ed. i., 
p. 154; ed. ii., p. 170. Frequent in the neighbourhood of Cromer; 
as the Beacon, i8th July, 1891 ; hedge banks, Sheringham, 22nd 
July, 1891 ; and hedge banks, Roughton Mill, 22nd July, 1891. 
Identified for me, as are all the other E. Norfolk Rubi which I send 
this year to the Club, by the Rev. E. F. Linton, who has long known 
this bramble in Norfolk, but could not find a name for it until this 
year. Genevier in his ‘ Monographie,’ pp. 170, 171, characterises this 
species by its very bristly and slightly glandular branches ; by its non- 
aciculate sepals, which are spreading after flowering ; by its small-sized 
rose or violet-coloured petals ; and by its violet-coloured stamens (at 
least at their base) exceeding the styles of the same colour. — Charles 
Bailey. “ Clearly R. Boraeanns^ as so well represented in the 
Cambridge Herb., and as found by Mr. Briggs near Plymouth. I have 
also seen specimens of the Rev. E. F. Linton’s from several E. Norfolk 
localities collected in 1888.” — W. M. Rogers. 
R. Borreri^ Bell-Salt. On the common near Mangotsfield 
Station, W. Gloster, 1891. Between Keynsham and Brislington, 
N. Somerset, September, 1892. Dulverton, 27th July, 1892, Som. S. 
— J. W. White. Also from Dulverton, Som. S., 1892. — R. P. 
Murray, who writes : “ I have sent a considerable supply of this. 
It has no connection with the plant of the London Catalogue, except 
the name, which had been misapplied until the Rev. W. M. Rogers 
discovered the true plant in the Borrer Herbarium at Kew. I have it 
from both the vice-counties of Somerset (5 and 6). It was formerly 
placed by Mr. Briggs as a var. of R. villicaulis^ while Prof. Babington 
