REPORT FOR 1892. 365 
agreed with me in placing it near i?. infestusT Rev. W Moyle 
Rogers says these are all typical. 
Rubiis anglosaxofiicus, O. Gelert. ‘ Saertryk af Botanisk 
Tidsskrift/ i6 bind, p. 8i. Edge of a field, in a narrow lane at the 
back of the New Bath Hotel, Matlock, Derbyshire, 5th October, 
1891. I first collected this plant at the same station, 28th July, 1884, 
and distributed it (not through the Exchange Club) as R. niacrophyllus^ 
W. & N. ; one of these 1884 specimens was named by Dr. Focke 
R. anglosaxonicus (see ‘ The Flora of Derbyshire,’ by Rev. W. H. 
Painter, p. 46). — Charles Bailey. “ This is hardly typical a?iglo 
saxonicus, though near it. I have seen from the same locality both 
good anglosaxonicus and rudis, and also plants which (like this of 
Mr. Bailey’s) seem intermediate between the two, and are probably of 
hybrid origin.” — W. M. Rogers. 
R. anglosaxonicus^ Gelert. Wood, Belmont, Herefordshire, 19th 
August, 1892. — Augustin Ley. Roadside, near Bailey Gate, 
Dorset (connecting type and var. raduloides), 26th August, 1892. — 
R. P. Murray. “The Bailey Gate plant is especially interesting to 
me as a link between typical anglosaxonicus and my var. raduloides, 
though I consider it nearer to the latter, especially in the stem leaves. 
The Belmont plant must, I think, go elsewhere. It seems essentially 
the same as the Rev. E. F. Linton’s Vales Wood specimens (see 
below) for which I have suggested the name R. Newbouldii, Bab., 
though I should add that I have seen no authentic specimens of that 
species.” — W. M. Rogers. 
R. anglosaxo 7 iicus, Gelert, var. raduloides, Rogers. Woods near 
Hanham, W. Gloucester, 29th August, and 3rd Sept., 1892. Leigh 
Woods, N. Somerset, 29th Aug., 1892. — J. W. White. “ 'I'he 
Hanham plant is one of several that I had before me when I 
wrote the description of raduloides (‘Journ. Bot.’, 1892, p. 269), 
and exactly represents that var. The specimens from Leigh Woods 
also belong, I consider, to the same var., though they are less strongly 
marked.” — W. M. Rogers. 
R. anglosaxonicus, Gelert. Chase Wood, Ross, Herefordshire, and 
R. anglosaxonicus, var. c. setulosus, Rogers, ‘ Journ. Bot.’, xxx., p. 269, 
in quarry at the foot of the same wood, July, 1892. The bush from 
which these specimens were taken was examined by the Rev. W. 
Moyle Rogers and myself, and by him pronounced to be what Dr. 
Focke had assured him to be exactly the Continental anglosaxonicus. 
I need scarcely say that it is quite different from the Matlock plant, 
which was formerly sent by me under the name of afiglosaxoniciis, 
but which is now recognised as R. rudis. This present plant is the 
form principally intended under R. macrophyllus var. b. macrophyllus 
of the ‘Flora of Herefordshire,’ p. 93. — W. H. Purchas. “I 
consider the former the typical plant, and should place the latter 
under my var. setulosus, but it is less extreme (and so nearer to my var. 
raduloides) than the Howie Hill plant which I had more particularly 
in view when describing setulosus.” — W. M. Rogers. 
R. afiglosaxonicus, var. setulosus, Rogers. Quarry at the foot of the 
Bleak Wood, Ross, Hereford, July, 1892. This is the R. Kochleri 
