368 THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
places fusco-atei' as a subordinate form allied to R. hystrix. From that, 
however, it may be readily distinguished by its far greater hairiness 
and the stronger, more abundant, and more unequal prickles.” — W. 
M. Rogers. The Rev. W. R. T^inton remarks that the petals are 
remarkably deep rich pink, stamens crimson, styles green, stem dark 
red, hairy, leaflets dark dull green. A new Record for the County. 
Ruhus viridis, Kalt. Witley, Surrey, July, 1892. — E. F. Linton. 
Thickets, Alltgoch, Radnor, 26th August, 1892. — Augustin Ley. 
R. Durotrigutn, R. P. Murray. Bere Wood, Dorset, August, 1892. 
— R. P. Murray. Aimer, Dorset, 1892. — W. H. Purchas. 
R. saxicolns, P. J. Muell. St. Leonard’s Forest, Holmbush, 
Sussex, 1 8th August, 1892. — J. W. White. “Clearly a larger state 
of a plant of Mr. White’s from the same locality, for which in 
November, 1891, Dr. Focke’s suggestion was: ‘A small var. of 
R. saxicolns ? ’ ” — W. M. Rogers. 
R. Kaltenbachii, Metsch. Borders of King’s Wood, Congresbury, 
N. Somerset, 21st August, 1892. — J. W. White. Heanton Pun- 
chardon, N. Devon, i6th July, 1892. — W, H. Painter. 
R. dumetorum ferox, Weihe. Ashford, N. Devon, July and 
August, 1892. — W. H. Painter. Near Shirley, S. Derbyshire, 
19th August, 1892. — W. R. Linton. “Rightly named, I believe; 
but there is often dififlculty in getting specimens of this variable plant 
all equally good from one locality, and these mostly represent it but 
indifferently.”— W. M. Rogers. 
R. ccBsius, L., var. laciniata^ Focke. Near Pencraig, Llangef, 
Anglesey, July, 1892. Do., var. arvalis, Focke. Near Bangor, April, 
1892. — J. E. Griffith. “Apparently what is meant here is that Dr. 
Focke has named these plants respectively var. (or forma) laciniata 
and var. arvalis, Rchbch. A brief description (in German) of the 
latter will be found in Focke’s ‘Syn. R. G.,’ p. 410. The former, I 
suppose, is merely a somewhat laciniate-leaved strong form of cccsius, 
though the panicle looks as if it might have some connection with R. 
corylifoliiis, Sm.”— W. M. Rogers. 
R. Lindleianus x Radula. Near Shirley, S. Derby, 2nd September, 
1892. Observed during three seasons. The two parents are the 
commonest brambles in its vicinity. — Wm. R. Linton. 
R. calvatus y. pubescens. Near Shirley, S. Derby, September, 1891 
and 1892, No. 67. Mr. Rogers accepts the hybridity, but thinks one 
parent must be a glandulose bramble. After another season’s observa- 
tion I still consider the above the correct parentage. — Wm. R. Linton. 
R. nemoralis x Sprengelii. Near Shirley, S. Derby, September, 
1892. This plant is sterile, intermediate between the two species, 
both of which were growing with it. — Wm. R. Linton. Respecting 
the hybrids R. Lindleianus x Radula, R. calvatus y pubescens, and R. 
nemoralis x Sprengelii, sent by Rev. W. R. Linton. The Rev. W. 
Moyle Rogers writes: — “That, while I see no reason to dissent 
from the suggestion of W. R. Linton in each case, I do not feel 
justified in giving an opinion either way positively without seeing 
the plant in question in situ, or having far more material before 
me to judge from.” 
