372 
THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
I believe. If a hybrid, then with obscurum, but I think not.” — 
E. S. Marshall. 
Epilobiuni inotitanuin^ L. forma minor^ Haussk. Glen Spean, near 
the Bridge of Spean, AV'esterness, August, 1891. — G. C. Druce. 
E. tetragonum, Linn., forma stenophyUa. Near Bray, Berks, July, 
1891. — G. C. Druce. 
E. alsi/uefolium, Vill., var. anceps, Er. MJcklefell, N. York, 
August, 1892. See note in Lees ‘ Flora N. Riding,’ under E. alsina- 
folium. — -J. A. Wh ELDON. “ No var. ; normal E. alsinafoliumP — E. 
S. Marshall. Dr. F. A. Lees, l.c.,says the Micklefell plant is larger in 
all its parts than the Ingleborough plant, and is var. anceps, Fries. — 
G. C. Druce. 
E. alsincefolium, Vill. Beinn Chaoruinn, Westerness, August, 
1891. — G. C. Druce. 
Ludwigia palustris, Elliott. New Forest, Hants, June, 1885. — 
G. C. Druce. 
Astrantia major, L. Woods above Stokesay Castle, Salop, 
August, 1892. — G. C. Druce. 
Trinia vulgaris, DC. St. Vincent’s Rock, Gloster W., August, 
1879. Its earlier name is T. glaberrima, Hoffm. — G. C. Druce. 
Apium nodifioriini, Reichb. f. Var. ochreatum, DC. St. Helen’s 
Green, Isle of Wight, July, 1892. — A. H. Wolley-Dod. “Correct, I 
believe.” — Arthur Bennett. Described by DeCandolle in the ‘ Pro- 
dromus,’ vol. iv., p. 104, as Helosciadium nodijioriim, var. ochreatum 
not ocreatum as cited in “ E. B. Supplement.” — G. C. Druce. 
Caucalis latifolia, L. Casual in a garden, Wilton, Lancashire, 
Aug., 1892. — J. A. Wheldon. 
Galium boreale, L. forma oreinum, Melvill. Ben Laoigh, W. Perth, 
at 2,000 feet, 31st July, 1891. — J. Cosmo Melvill. See ‘Rep.’ for 
1891, p 337. Is it anything more than a stunted form? I found a 
plant reverting from the type in the opposite direction from this. It 
grew amid Vaccinium Afyrtillus in Glenmore, and from its large 
leaves and lax habit suggested Rubia when seen from a distance. 
Has Mr. Melvill cultivated it ? — G. C. Druce. 
G. Mollugo, L., var. elatuvi (Thuill). Pangbourne, Berks, 
Aug., 1890. — G. C. Druce. 
G. Afollugo, L., var. insubricum (Gaud.) fide Arthur Bennett. 
Howth to Dublin, 24th June, 1892. — H. C. Levinge. '‘''Insubricum 
and Baker i appear to be substantially the same.” — J. Gilbert Baker. 
“ I have not seen a specimen from Gaudin, but this seems to be the 
plant so called. Its proper varietal name would probably be G. 
Afollugo var. latifolium. Sender (1851), which is pre-occupied by var. 
latifolium, Wallroth (1822), and which is likely the same plant. Is 
not the var. Bakeri, Syme, the same as the var. angustifolium of 
Leyssers’ ‘Flora Halensis ’ (1761)? For a full account by Mr. 
Baker of Syme’s plant see ‘ Journ. Bot.,’ 1863, p. 290-3.” — Arthur 
Bennett. Leyser in ‘Flora Halensis,’ Ed. i., p. 23 (1761, preface 
dated 1760), gave no names to the varieties of Galium Afollugo ; in 
Ed. ii., p- 37 (1783), he cited G. Afollugo a?igustifolia from Leers’ 
‘FI. Herbonensis,’ No. 115. If the identity be correct the varietal 
