REPORT FOR 1895. 
473 
year, 1894, a number of foreign plants came up; Trifolium resupin- 
atum, L. ; a handsome Ciiicus near to pycnocephalus, L. ; Centaurea 
Calcitrapa, L., new to district, &c. ; but only M. indica, AIL, has 
appeared this year, 31st July, 1895. This plant seems to have settled 
itself in quantities in the meadow, 7th September, 1895. — C. E. 
Palmer, I have since found this plant growing in great plenty in the 
Hop Gardens, on quite a different part of Odiham. — C. E. P. “ I do 
not think this is an American species. At all events it is not a 
native of Canada, although it has occurred there as a casual {Jide 
Macoun, ‘Cat.’).”— W. H. B. 
Trifolium hybridum, L. Colwyn Bay, Denbighshire, July, 1895. 
— W, H. Painter. ^ — New County Record. 
Lotus tenuis^ Kit. Waste pasture land between Hurst Castle and 
Milford-on-Sea, S. Hants, June, 1895. — J. Cosmo Melvill. 
Lathyrus ?iiger, Wimm. Cult. Bournemouth, June and July, 
1894. — W. Moyle Rogers, Shackleford, Surrey, 24th June, 1895; 
naturalised. — E. S. Marshall, 
Prunus Cerasus. Near Egremont, Cumberland, 24th May, 1895. 
This is not included in the last edition of Watson’s ‘Topographical 
Botany.’ I found it growing in hedges about a mile east of Egremont 
some seven or eight years ago ; since then I have found it in many 
places — always in hedges — both north-east, east, and south of Egre- 
mont, in about twelve to twenty different places. — -Joseph Adair. 
“Mentioned in ‘Top. Botany’ as a very doubtful record for Cum- 
berland. The present specimens appear to be rightly named.” — 
W.H.B. 
Rubus idcBus, Linn., var. asperrmms, Lees. Alum Chine, Bourne- 
mouth, S. Hants. June, 1894, and 6th July, 1895. — W. Moyle 
Rogers. “Faunt’s Bog,” Knock Drin, Co. Westmeath, 27th July, 
1895. New to Uistr. VII, ‘ Cybele Hibernica.’ — H. C. Levinge. 
“Not quite Lees’ plant, which has '‘tawny setaceous bristles.’” — 
W. M. R. 
R. fissus^ Lindl. Mere Clough, Prestwich, S. E. Lancashire, 26th 
July, 1895. Named by Rev. E. S. Marshall. New for v.c. 59. 
Hitherto considered R. suberectus, Anders., in this locality. — J. C. 
Melvill. “Undoubtedly — W. M. R. 
R. plicatus, AV. & N., form. About Drwsynant, Merioneth, Aug., 
1895. A form approaching R. nitidus. — Wm. R. Linton. “This 
handsome, long-stamened form of R. plicatus seems to me identical 
with Slesvig specimens of R. Bertramii, G. Braun, that I have received 
from Mr. Eriderichsen. It is far from being an uncommon British 
form.”— W. M. R. 
R. plicatus^ W, & N., var. Drwsynant and Rhydymaen, Dolgelly, 
Merioneth, 6th and 7th Aug., 1895. A narrow-leaved variety not so 
common as the type. — A\'m. R. Linton. “This hairy, narrow-leaved 
