REPORT FOR 1895. 
475 
J?. villuaulis, Koehl, var. Selmeri (Lindeb.), E. F. Linton. Edge 
of Derwentwater, Grange-in-Borrowdale, Cumberland, 28th Sept., 
1894; also in the open, on rough ground about a quarry between 
Bridge End and Oakwood, north of Hexham, S. Northumberland, 21st 
July, 1894. — Charles Bailey. “ In the Derwentwater packet two of 
the specimens are li. Selmeri^ but the rest are R. Lindleianus. The 
beautiful Hexham specimens are all good Selmeri." — W. M. R. 
R. grains., Focke, var.? Walton, Lancs., 6th Aug., 1895. ^ further 
supply of the foliaceous-sepaled plant referred to on page 440 of the 
‘Report.’ — J. A, Wheldon. “ Certainly A. grains, I think, though 
with untypical leaves ; but then all the stem pieces sent are exception- 
ally weaL” — W. M. R. 
R. lencandrns, Focke. Hedgerows, Milford-on-Sea, S. Hants. 
24th June, 1895.— J. Cosmo Melvill. “Apparently right, but 
specimens too immature for certainty.” — W. M. R. 
R. pubescens, Weihe, var. subinermis, Rogers. Depot Road (and 
St. Leonard’s Estate), Horsham, Sussex, i6th July, 1895. Abundant 
over a large area in W. Sussex. — J. W. White. “ A good supply of 
characteristic specimens. I have also seen it in great quantity near 
Bexley and Battle, E. Sussex.” — W. M. R. 
R. ihyrsoidens, Wimm. (sp. collect.) (i.) Swarkestone, Derby., 
6th Sept., 1895. In hedges and on banks about Swarkestone and 
Chellaston. Quite distinct in habit and appearance from R. 
■rusticanus, which was plentiful in the same locality. — Wm. R. Linton. 
(2) Near Valley, Holyhead, Anglesey, September, 1895. — J. E. 
Griffith. “ (i.) Well marked ihyrsoideus. (2.) A very remarkable 
and beautiful form, which I agreed with Mr. Griffith in placing under 
R. ihyrsoideus. Dr. Focke writes of it : ‘ Certainly a R. ihyrsoidens 
aggregate. It does not match, however, one of our sub-species 
growing in Central Europe. I think I saw plants like this one from 
France or N. Italy, but I cannot give a name.’ W. M. R. 
R. silvaiicns, W. and N. (i) near Bethesda, Carnarvonshire, July, 
1895 — J. E. Griffith. (2) Wood, Bigsweir, Monmouthshire, 
14th August, 1895. — Augustin Lev. “(i) Yes. (2) I think, 
undoubtedly, a form of R. Sprengelii, Weihe, with some of the 
fruiting sepals only sub-patent, or occasionally even loosely reflexed, 
instead of rather ascending as usual. The more narrow-pan icled 
specimens certainly recall R. silvaiicus, but are still kept distinct from 
it by the numerous stalked glands on stem and panicle rachis and 
the longer more patent sub-umbellate branches. Flowering specimens 
would, of course, give other distinguishing characters.” — W. M. R. 
R. macrophyllns, W. & N., var. Schlechiejidalii, (Weihe). (i) Nant-y- 
Glo, Colwyn, Denbighshire, July, 1895. — Painter. (2) “ Briary 
Bent,” Knock Drin, Co. Westmeath, 28th Aug., 1895. — H. C. 
