REPORT FOR 1 895. 
f 481 
B. corylifoHus, Sm,, var. cydophyllus, Lindeb. Colwyn Bay, Den- 
bighshire, July, 1895. — W. H. Painter. “Rightly named, I think, 
and, if so, new for the county ; but the material is hardly such as to 
admit of a thoroughly satisfactory determination.” — W. M. R. 
R. Balfourianus, Blox., or R. cyclophyllus, Lindeb. ? E. F. Linton. 
Hedge near Roxburgh, N. Roxburghshire, 17th July, 1894. — Charles 
Bailey. “ Neither in stem nor panicle, I think, does this beautiful 
plant quite agree with R. Balfourianus, though on the whole it seems 
nearer to that than to R. cyclophyllusP — W. M. R. 
R. affinis^ B riggsianus x .? incurvatus, fide W. M. R. Llanfair, 
Merioneth, 8th Aug, 1895. — W. R. Linton. “I suppose that the 
suggestion of a probable origin is as far as we can get here.” — W.M.R. 
R. Lindleianus x raditla, E. F. Linton. Hedge in the cross lane 
from the I-eazes to the high road to Hexham, S. Northumberland, i8th 
July, 1894, — Charles Bailey. “ The only feature which I see in the 
dried specimens unfavourable to Mr. Linton’s suggestion is the 
tendency of the sepals to rise. In this instance, a positive determina- 
tion is hardly possible from pieces collected so early in the season, 
even when so carefully selected and well pressed.” — W. M. R. 
Potentilla rupesiris^ L., seedlings, Hort. Croydon, 1894. Root 
from Craig Breidden, Montgomery. — Ar. Bennett. 
P. argenUa, L. On trap rock between Damory Biidge and 
Falfield, West Gloucester, 17th September, iJ New County 
record. — ]as. W. White. 
Alchemilla vulgaris — the three forms. Shirley and neighbourhood, 
May, 1895. “Of the three forms A. jilicaidis is the usual plant of 
pastures, and is by far the most frequent in my neighbourhood, 
though none of the three is rare.” — W m. R. Linton. 
A. vulgaris^ L. vox. Jilicaulis, (Buser). Meadows, Piercefield, Mon., 
20th May, 1895. — W. A. Shoolbred. “ Examples of the above 
Alckemillas have been sent to Dr. Buser, but I am at present 
without his reply.” — W. H, Beeby. 
Pyrus minima, Ley. Craig Cille, Breconshire, 4th June and 28th 
August, 1895. — Augustin Ley. “I sent Mr. Ley’s interesting 
Pyrus to Dr. Conwentz, and he very kindly forwarded the specimens 
to Prof. Koehne, of Berlin, an authority on the Pomacere. His 
report is below” (translation): “The plant stands nearest to Aria 
Mougeoti, G. Beck {Sorbus Mogeoti, Soyer-Will. et Godr.), but 
has still smaller and narrower leaves, and apparently smaller flo vers. 
Besides, the interior parts of the flowers and fruit present .nail 
differences in form which make it appear very likely that the plant 
represents a true species. Whether these differences are constant 
can only be proved by cultivation. It is very desirable that seeds of 
