434 I'HE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
not mention Borcei in his ‘ FI. Plymouth.’ As far as I can judge, this 
ought to be kept separate from F. pallidiflora^ Jordan. — Edward S. 
Marshall. I should say clearly F. Bored. — W. R. L. 
Barbarea . Seed from wall top, Ross, Herefordshire, 20th 
July, 1894. The seed of the cultivated plant was taken from some 
Herefordshire locality, and I believe from the wall top at Ross from 
which I now send the wild plant ; at all events I believe both to 
represent one and the same form. This form is different from the 
ordinary B. vulgaris of Herefordshire in having much more slender 
pods which are constantly spreading, and seeds longer than broad, 
especially those in the middle of the pods. The pods in B. vulgaris 
are often adpressed or spreading on different parts of the same plant. 
The plant sent by me in 1891 is the same form as the one now sent. 
No opinion was given upon it in 1891. See ‘Report,’ p. 324.— 
Augustin Ley. “The leaves here are much like aixuata, but I 
believe this to be only a vulgaris form having the pods more slender 
and spreading. I notice that B. prezeox growing on a wall top near 
here has the pods much more slender than the usual plant.” — 
A. Bennett. “ Apparently the same as a plant the Rev. E. S. Marshall 
had in cultivation (root from Thursley), and for which I understand 
Mr. Beeby suggested the name B. vulgaris var. pseudo- are uata .” — 
E. F. Linton. Certainly vulgaris, f., for which Mr. Beeby’s name 
s:ems very suitable. — W. R. L. 
B. stricta, Andrz. Roadside between Odiham and Winchheld 
Station, N. Hants, 17th May and 14th June, 1894. — C. E. Palmer. 
“ I think this is only a form of B. vulgaris ; the flowers appear too 
large for B. strictal ' — G. C. Druce. 
Draba iucana, Linn. Cnochan rocks, W. Ross. Gathered in 
June, 1894, on the same range of rocks as Dryas, namely the Cnochan 
rocks, West Ross, for which county it is a personal voucher. — G. 
Claridge Druce. 
Erophila vulgaris, DC. Witley, Surrey, 26th March, 1894. No. 
T2 20. This is, I think, our ordinary ‘typical’ plant, as regards 
Britain. It seems to come near Jordan’s E. majuscula, but the petals 
are smaller than as described for that, and appeared to be veinless. — 
Edward S. Marshall. 
E. ? Near E. hirfella, Jord. Milford Heath, Surrey, 31st 
March, 1894. No. 1221. This seems to agree well enough with 
Boreau’s description of E. hirtella, Jordan, the few specimens of which 
that I have seen are too meagre to be of much service. The plant is 
of a yelloivish-gxeen, and well-grown specimens look very characteristic, 
n a living state. Abundant on the Milford cricket ground (Milford 
Heath), in places where the grass is thin and patchy. Soil a very 
light sand. The seeds are ovate, covered with fine a.sperities. — 
Edward S. Marshall, 
E. . Perhaps E. viresee?is, Jord. Milford, Surrey, 20th 
March and 7th April, 1894. Nos. 1216, 1217. This is very abundant 
on the lower Greensand about Milford and ^Vitley, Surrey, preferring 
grassy spots, but sometimes occurring on hedge-banks. 'Phe leaves 
