REPORT FOR 1 894. 
443 
Riibus Gelertii, Frid., var. criniger, Linton. little Doward (in an 
open wood border), Herefordshire, 26th July, 1894. Seen by Rev. 
W, M. Rogers, to whose determination I owe the name. — Augustin 
Ley. “ A form of criniger with leaves thinner and more subglabrous 
beneath and more finely serrate than usual ; panicle right.” — E. F. 
Linton. 
R. lasioclados, Focke? Wood border, Ross, 24th July, 1893. 
The name here suggested is, I fear, wrong. — Augustin Ley. “ Here, 
it seems to me, the alliance is closer with R. anglosaxonicus than 
with R. lasioclados. A rather frequent and locally abundant plant in 
Herefordshire.” — W. M. Rogers. “ This is not my R. lasioclados^ 
but it may be that I once have suggested this name for imperfect 
dried specimens. The plant reminds one of R. anglosaxonicus^ 
R. Babingtonii, and other forms.” — Dr. Focke. 
R. diversifolius x Lindleianus I Black Bull Lane, Orrell Park, 
Lancashire, Aug., 1894. — J. A. Wheldon. “ i?. Weihe.” — 
W. M. Rogers. 
R. Borreri, Bell-Salt, var. virgultorum^ Ley. Tomlinshill, 28th 
June, 1893 ; Leysters, Herefordshire, 4th October, 1894. These two 
sets represent extremes in the variety, that from Tomlinshill (on an 
open common) being far more thorny and hairy, that from Leysters 
(in a wood) far less so, than the type. I believe both to be rightly 
referred to var. virgultorum. — Augustin Ley. Mr. Rogers remarks 
on the Leysters plant : “ This seems to take a well-marked step away 
from average virgultorum towards typical Borreri^ and so is very 
satisfactory as justifying the association of virgultorum with Borreri 
rather than with infestusP 
R. radula, Weihe, var. anglicanus, Rogers. Branksome Woods, 
Dorset, 28th July, 1894. — R. P. Murray. “Yes, very characteristic.” 
— W. M. Rogers. Also from same locality, and from Holdenhurst, S. 
Hants, July, 1894. — F. A. Rogers for W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. oigoclados, Muell. and Lefv. Chard Common, S. Somerset, 
13th July, 1893.— R. P. Murray. “Yes, a small form, such as is 
abundant in parts of S. Devon.” — W. M. Rogers. 
R. tnelanodermis, Focke. Branksome Woods, Dorset, 28th July, 
1894. — R. P. Murray. “The typical plant.” — W. M. Rogers. 
R. inutabilis, Genev., Yar. nemorosus^ Genev. Coleridge, S. Devon, 
5th July, 1894. — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. mutabilis x rusticanus. Near Witley, Surrey, 14th Aug., 1894. 
Agreed to by Dr. Focke and Rev. W, Moyle Rogers, in whose com- 
pany I found it. About intermediate between the parents which grow 
together close by. Almost wholly sterile. — Edward S. Marshall. 
R. Bloxa^nii, Lees, x R. leticostachys, Schleich. ? Hinton Admiral, 
on the common by Wooton Road, S. Hants, 17th July, 1894. — F. A. 
Rogers for W. Moyle Rogers. The naming is only by way of 
suggestion, as I have not seen the plant growing ; but I believe that 
there is certainly R. Bloxatnii in it. — W. M. R. 
