332 
THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
R. Lintoni. In stem and leaf it rather recalls R. Drejeri ; but Mr. 
Ley is no doubt right in maintaining that it is distinct from that also. 
Dr. Focke has seen it again and can make no further suggestion at 
present. As it is so widely distributed in Herefordshire, it will 
probably have to be described and named as a new species.” — W. 
Moyle Rogers. 
Rubus , ‘intermediate between R. Koehleri , R. hystrix , and R. 
hirtus .’ — Dr. O. Focke. Anglesey. — J. E. Griffith. 
R. Koehleri , Weihe. Lower slopes of Leith Hill, Surrey, 7th 
August, 1890. — J. W. White. “Yes, identical with the R. Koehleri 
var. hirsuta referred to in ‘Journ. of Botany’ 1891, p. 341.” — W. 
Moyle Rogers. 
R. sp. Wood, Wormsley, Herefordshire, 30th September, 
1891; woods, Dinmore, Herefordshire, 19th August, 1891. The 
Wormsley plant appears to me closely to resemble the Dinmore plant 
placed under the R. fusco-ater , of Briggs’ ‘ Flora.’ The Rev. W. 
M. Rogers concurs in this remark. I have a remark of Mr. Briggs 
upon a plant similar to these two from another part of Herefordshire, 
written in 1889, “ I agree in this being a plant put under R. fusco-ater 
in the ‘ Flora of Plymouth’; at least it is essentially the same. It seems 
to be near a plant that Prof. Babington recognises as melanoxylon.” 
Both the Rev. W. M. Rogers and Dr. Focke concur in placing the 
Dinmore plant near the R. fusco-ater of Mr. Briggs’ ‘ Flora of 
Plymouth,’ or rather that form of it which he places near the R. 
omalodontos of Mull. Dr. Focke’s words are ‘ R. omalodontos of 
Briggs, =R. oigoclados, Mull.’ — A ugustin Ley. “These two are 
clearly one and the same. When Messrs. Purchas and Ley shewed 
me the Dinmore plant last August, we agreed that it was like the 
R. fusco-ater of ‘FI. Ply.’ ; and this view was confirmed by Dr. Focke, 
who wrote to me on it ‘ Mr. Briggs knew this bramble very well, and 
during the last few years he used to call it near omalodo?itos. } I think 
it may be R. oigoclados , Muell. et Lefvre., but I am not sure about 
this name.” — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. under dumetorum ? Breamore Down, South Hants, 3 1 st 
August, 1891. Petals pink. — E. F. Linton. “Looks like a hybrid ; 
but may be a form of R. dumetorum , ferox , W. and N.” — W. Moyle 
Rogers. 
R. saxicolus , Mull. Woods, Great Doward, Herefordshire, 
6th August, 1891. This plant has been previously sent to the Club 
under various names. See ‘Report’ 1888, p. 210 (. saxicolus , Mull) : 
1 890, p. 294 ( foliosus , Weihe). The present specimens were submitted 
to Dr. Focke, who pronounced them to be R. divexiramus , Miill. — 
Augustin Ley. “ Determined to be R. divexiramus , P. J. Muell., 
by Dr. Focke, who writes : ‘ Agrees exactly with French divexiramus , 
or at least with specimens considered to he authentic.’ I have just 
the same plant of Mr. Briggs’ collecting, ‘ between Beer Alstone and 
Tavistock, Devon.’” — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. adornatus , Mull. Wood, Aymestrey, Herefordshire, 1st 
October, 1891. Petals white ; stamens at first white, changing after 
fall of the petals to deep red ; styles red, becoming deeper in colour. 
