REPORT FOR 1 89 1 . 
329 
Rubus sp. Thickets, Hamddu Valley, Monmouth, 21st August, 
1891 . — Augustin Ley. “ Dr. Focke has named this R. sylvaticus , W. 
and N.” — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. sp. Woods between Presteigne and Lingen, Herefordshire, 
October, 1891 . — Augustin Ley. “ R. sylvaticus , I believe ; specimen 
too old for certain determination.” — W. Moyle Rogers. “ R. sylvaticus , 
W. and N., the British form bearing larger prickles than the Continental. 
Stems glabrous, which are very hairy in the typical plant. Notwithstand- 
ing these differences I think it convenient to consider the plant as a 
variety of R. sylvaticus.”— Dr. Focke. 
R. villicaulis , Koehl, Pen Dingas, Aberyswith, July, 1891. — 
W. Hunt Painter. “Apparently right, but specimen wretchedly 
inadequate.” — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. sp. St. Weonards, Herefordshire, 5th September, 1891. — 
Augustin Ley. “ R. argentatus , P. J. Muell. The only specimen 
of the parcel (besides No. 14) which I can name positively. It is my 
argentatus , a name adopted by me because I have been told it is the 
true plant named by Mueller.” — Dr. Focke. 
R. adscitus , Genev. See ‘Report,’ 1889, p. 251. Pengethley, 
Herefordshire, 12th August, 1891 ; Peterstow, Herefordshire, 15th 
August, 1891, see ‘Report’ 1886, p. 148; Lyonshall Park Wood, 
Herefordshire, 25th September, 1891. See ‘ Report,’ 1889, p. 248 
(under the name of R. montanus , Wirtg. ? — Augustin Ley. “ Clearly 
all the same, and not separable from the plant which we have been 
calling adscitus , though that is sometimes considerably glandular. 
‘ The name of R. adscitus ,’ Dr. Focke writes to me, ‘ is certainly 
synonymous with R. hypoleucus , Lefevre et Muell., published in 1859, 
one year earlier than adscitus ’ ; but he adds that Godron’s name 
micans is the oldest and certainly stands for the same plant.” — W. 
Moyle Rogers. 
R. sp. Aberuchill Woods, Comrie, Perthshire, August, 1890. — 
J. Cosmo Melvill. “Panicle belongs to Lindebergii , P. J. Muell. 
There is no proper barren stem.” — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. pulcherrimus, Newman = R. polyanthemus , Lindeb. var. 
Griffithii. Near Bryn Llwyd, Bangor, October, 1891. — J. E. 
Griffith. “ I can quite believe that this should go to R. pulcher- 
rimus , Newman, but certainty is out of the question with such a 
specimen. I know nothing of ‘ var. Griffithii.' 1 ” — W. Moyle Rogers. 
See ‘Report,’ 1889, p. 251. 
R. sp. Woods between Presteigne and Lingen, Herefordshire, 
1st October, 1891 . — Augustin Ley. “ R. piletostachys.” — Dr. Focke. 
R. thyrsiflorus , W. and N. Vallet’s Wood, near Titley, Hereford- 
shire, 25th September, 1891. A form of R. fuscus, W. and N., I 
suspect, but I don’t understand thyrsiflorus. — Augustin Ley. “ R. 
macrophyllus , Dr. Focke, a glanduliferous form ? approaching f uscus.” 
— Dr. Focke. 
R. montanus , Wirtg. ? Near Tintern, Monmouthshire, 2nd Sept., 
1891 . — x\ugustin Ley. “Var. of R. amplijicatusV' is Dr. Focke’s 
suggestion here.” — W. Moyle Rogers. 
