326 THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
Lotus corniculatus , L., var. On shingle, Aberystwith, Wales, July, 
1891. — W. H. Painter. This seems to be the var. microphyllum , 
Meyer, ‘ Hannov. Magaz.,’ p. 1 70, 1824, but I have not seen a specimen 
of Meyer’s. 
Onobrycliis sativa, Lam. Fields between Cromer and Runton, 
East Norfolk, 18th July, 1891. — Charles Bailey. Additional to 
Vice County 27. 
Rubus Idceus , L., var. Leesii , Bab. Hulland Ward, near Shirley, 
S. Derbyshire, 5th September, 1891. Seemingly spontaneous; new 
locality. — W. R. Linton. A new record for County 57, Derby. 
R. Jissus, Lindl. Near Garn Dolbenmaen, Carnarvonshire, August, 
1891. — J. E. Griffith. “Yes.” — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. opacus, Focke. Peat moor, near Shapwick, North Somerset, 
9th ’September, 1891. Abundant here, but not recognised before this 
date, when specimens were gathered and named by the Rev. W. M. 
Rogers. The plant produced abundance of fine fruit, and is far 
larger and stronger than the plicatus that grows with it. I would 
point out that the sepals of the two species differ materially in shape : 
those of opcicus being, for the most part, roundish-oval with short 
points, while in plicatus they are commonly prolonged at the tips into 
linear points of great length. — J. W. White. “Yes.” — W. Moyle 
Rogers. 
R. sulcatus , Vest. ? Vallets Wood, Titley, Herefordshire, 25th 
September, 1891. Seen in a dried state by Rev. W. M. Rogers, 
and pronounced by him to be undoubtedly correct. This is not the 
same plant as that sent by me in 1887 from Lyonshall, and pronounced 
to be “ sulcatus ” by Prof. Babington. See ‘Report’ 1887, p. 173. — 
Augustin Ley. “Yes.” — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. nitidus , W. andN. ? Edlaston, near Shirley, South Derbyshire, 
nth September, 1891. — W. R. Linton. “ R. villicaulis , Koehl., I 
believe, but the specimen is weak.” — W. M. Rogers. 
R. vitidus , W. and N.. var. Aberystwith, July, 1891. Dr. Focke, 
who has kindly examined the Aberystwith Rubi for me, and named 
most of them, writes, respecting this plant, “ Var. near holothyrsus, 
Focke.” — W. Hunt Painter. “ The panicle (very poor) seems to 
belong to R. villicaulis , Koehl., but the only stem-piece sent (a scrap 
from the top) looks more like incurvatus , Bab.” — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. affinis , W. and N. Peat-moors, north of Shapwick, North 
Somerset, 9th September, 1891. This is identical with the Dorset 
plants to which Dr. Focke refers in his ‘ Notes on British Rubi,’ pub. 
in ‘Journ. Bot.,’ April, 1890, as corresponding exactly with German 
affinis. — James W. White. 
R. sp. Hulland Wood, South Derbyshire, September, 1891. — 
W. R. Linton. 
R. sp. Atlow, South Derbyshire, 2nd August, 1891.— W. R. 
Linton. “ I can give no name to either; the plants remind me of 
small forms of our German vulgaris .” — Dr. Focke. 
R. argenteus , Weihe. Hedges near Woollard, North Somerset ; 
3rd September, 1891. See ‘Exch. Club Report’ for 1889, p. 249, 
for a note that was written before R. erythrinus had been described 
