THE SUBSTITUTE. 
I2fi 
DESIDERATA. 
Leucopliasia Sinapis, 
Arge Galalhea, 
Argynnis Adippe, 
Nemeobius Luciua, 
Theda Rubi, 
„ W-album, 
Polyommatus Aigiolus, 
„ Corydon, 
Steropes Paniscus, 
Procris Statices, 
Smerintbus ocellatiis, 
Zeuzera jEsculi, 
Endrumis versicolor, 
Cerura vinula, 
Notodonta Dromedarius, 
Pteiostoma palpina, 
Clostera reclusa, 
„ curtula, 
Psilura monacha, 
Portbesia aurillua, 
Eutbemonia russula, 
Lasiocampa Trifolii, 
Eriogaster lanestris, 
Odonedis potatoria, 
Gastropacba quercifolia, 
Apatela leporina, 
Mainestra Persicaria;, 
Calocala Fraxini, 
Ilipparcbus Papilionarius, 
Pteropboms pentadactylus, 
„ pallidactylus, 
Alucita bexadaclylus. 
— David P. Morison, 49, King 
Street, Perth. 
Lepidoptera. — I am in want of 
tbe lollowing: — 
Eitbosia mesomelia, 
Orgyia fascelina, 
Luperina connexa, 
Noctua Dablii, 
„ depuncta, 
Ortbosia Ypsilon, 
Euporia fulvago, 
Xanibia aurago, 
Polia serena, 
„ Cbi, 
Aplecta occulta. 
Aplecta tincta, 
Anarta Myrtilli, 
Plusia iuscripta, 
Fidonia plumaria, 
Nyssia zonaria, 
Coremia erutaria, , 
Eudorea murana, 
Gelechia desertella, 
„ mundella, 
Elacbista apicipunctella. 
I cannot at present send anything 
in return ; but if those who send 
me duplicates will state ibeir wants 
I will endeavour to supply them. 
Boxes and stamps will be re- 
turned immediately. I should be 
much obliged if any one could 
assist me with tbe pupa of Cerura 
vinula and of Hybemia progem- 
maria . — C. Knight, 19, Darley 
Street, Leeds. 
COMMUNICATIONS. 
Phlogophora einpyrea. — In re- 
ferring to my letters to you of tbe 
20ib and 27th of October, there 
appears some discrepancy. I made 
tbe captures of P. einpyrea on the 
14tb and 18th of October, — three 
on tbe 14tb and one on tbe 18th, 
making two pairs. Mr. Hemmings 
is in error in staling that I effected 
my captures on tbe loth of October. 
Thinking that nothing but tbe 
truth should appear, I give tbe 
explanation. — George Smith, 9, 
King Street, Brighton; Dec. 13, 
1856. 
Phlogophora empyrea, ^-c., at 
Brighton. — It appears that tbe ob- 
servations made by myself and 
Mr. Winter and tbe editorial note 
in No. 1 of tbe ‘ Substitute,’ have 
given offence to some individuals 
here; for various reasons, it was 
well known at the time those ob- 
