XHE WOnMXVIM HVKE tEYLE XIF 
'i:"' 
I 
K 
; umm^Am hare 
4^ mumMS: ^ ^ \ 
r^4 
im<)!!tsit«Ma'3?ar0 ai-e al! 
mji to, Brl^sOj tslaadd " 
. ^ ?>rx?f«sed for it bx Europe, trai 
^f*|fc«^^li^^-im 2 iied was bestowed';! 
.m. xf^: ^^eneraily adopt _ _ 
‘r-- m- 2 ;^i'«-iKrei to the ecasoili'' 
described this species and^.’ 
hkT ^he r^--i%iiom stated in the foregoing .article; 
opinion* the confusion which 
so 4 : 4 ogy fey rsa^isfeiTlng the name timidus to the 
■5%'V- 
to be comemplatet^ and it seems wis««c tofol'- 
km- ?.4;s«' <d th^ txvilmiXy ot authors-— o«c^ay«»i plurimomni^^hO 
e.^W'---tr 4 ^#l<iy€d 3Gan’Ei<'^-* here adopted {tkmdus and variabUis) f©r''"thev 
' 4*' It- is us'^vc^sary in a work like the present to disoiss 
t.m *-' safe^sped^:^. which have fecea proposed for both the conunottr. 
tok md ri^-e sw-kiixain hare, based •either ,upon individual varia- 
■dm <»r distribution. Some idea may fee formed of the lengthiy 
TO wMcfe 6*yttei.'mstists' now go m cisanging names and C‘\ni 
'’■sub’speeics ■■-* whesr we find it seriously proposed to disting?iioh the 
common brown fsare-of England from cishftneixtal form by calHttg it 
l^pm the feeing' taken from a .specimeai#| ' 
• V/e sue d'xtfe iis« '*- is, on the Average, not sO; hea- 
-^6 4?^ VC. W f ;Mve ia®^;4ma any hares.in-^'ua#, 
m -(M -opproached hi mm ^nd 
;|w^ W 4 ? |{»t In our own eastern counties. Agair^ wt^;| 
ik \ '-K' ia of .« .ridtef and darker coicuir, fedtT''''' 
Ivavo ^iiiMvIdual 'Turla^Hma of colour even witiilu 
htrd?^ a r^niy to attach my hp.ipt’hmm to wfeat 
calfeNl hO>ck " * teir«#Ji<tlng views. I oa one .occasion, ^er, 
uhdottng Itefi^tioUt. when- 153 feam.-w^'O luid'out, ^eiag a numhe^l 
of them vm#*d. The di.: ^noe in ate* sifenpe, colour and weigh-t wsis.j^ 
marked i.lia^iL«te«ialist- in- *"hak splVlt-ing.,'^* if -so- disposed^ nughr 
1^6 ■ ' 
life. • ' . ' SSil.^.4d.'k 
