CONCERNING ESURIS BARBER (NOT STAR) AND 
NEOSURIS BARBER, WITH A NEW SUBSPE- 
CIES FROM IDAHO. (HEMIPTERA- 
HETEROPTERA: LYGiEIDAE) 
By H. G. Barber 
Roselle, N. J. 
For an understanding of tlie sequence of the descrip- 
tions it is necessary to cite the complete bibliography for 
my genus E saris (not Stal), with some added comments: 
1911 Esuris castanea Barber, Jl. N. Y. Ent. Soc. XIX, 
27 (brachypterous form, Arizona). 
1916 Bergroth, Proc. Roy. Soc. Viet. (N. S.), Pt. I, 15 
(foot-note), remarks that Esuris castanea Barber 
does not belong to Stal’s genus Esuris. This reprint 
was not received until after the publication of the 
following 1918 articles. 
1918 Esuris fulgidus Barber, Jl. N. Y. Ent. Soc. XXVI, 
51 (brachypterous form, Arizona). Notes the dis- 
covery of the macropterous form of castanea and 
transfers it to the tribe Myodochini. 
1918 Esuris Barber (not Stal), Psyche, XXV, 78. 
Keyed to the tribe Myodochini. 
1924 Neosuris new genus, Barber, Jl. N. Y. Ent. Soc. 
XXXII, 133. Erected for castanea , but leaving ful- 
gidus in Stal’s Esuris. 
1946 Bueno, Entom. Amer. XXVI (N. S.), 68. Cor- 
rectly placed both castanea and f idgidus in the genus 
Neosuris. 
Genus Neosuris Barber 1924 
Head much wider than long, imbedded nearly to the 
eyes ; eyes mediocre, not strongly protruding ; preocular 
portion of head subequal to the length of an eye ; anten- 
niferous tubercles very short; ocelli obsolete. Antennae 
lightly incrassate, basal segment short, barely surpassing 
apex of tylus, second but little longer than third. Ros- 
trum extended to the intermediate coxae; basal segment 
