[ »8 ] 
V* 
0 
is* 
4 $ 
d 
d • 
*>« 
O n) 
u iz 
C d 
£ 
w 
c 
0 
• H 
* 
d 
c 
6 
X 
W 
h 
0 
z 
•*-» d 
^ (L> 
>x 
Ont> 
X w. 
ttj 0 
Companion. 
.5 
d 
> 
cu 5 .2 
S 0 S 
3-1 'w i-, 
■ 2 
: 24 
*5 
4.7 
264,7 
262 
1266 
385 
7 Max. ift, 262 : 264,7 : : 385 : 319 7 
5 Max. 2d, 15 : 4,7 :: 1266 : 397 ) 
8 — 
49 : 5 ° 
2d ■ 
1 
* 5» 8 5 
275 
141 1 
| Max. i ft, 114: 275 : : 117: 282 "[ 
34 — 
8 : 9 
io 
3>55 
114 
117 
J Max. 2d. 15,85 : 3,55 141 1 : 316 J 
3 d ' 
1 1 
14.2 
342 
1 5°5 
7 Max. ift, 167,5 : 342 :: 212 : 433 7 
17— 
25 : 26 
17 
4.25 
1675 
212 
j Max. 2d, 1 4,2 : 4,25 :: 1 505 : 450 J 
Maxim III. "That the quantity of water expended 
being the fame , the effedl is nearly as the Jquare of 
its velocity . 
This will appear by comparing the contents of 
columns 3, 8, and 10, in any of the fetts of experi- 
ments ; as for 
Example if of N°. 2. with N°. 24. viz. 
N°. Turns in a min. Expence. Effeft. 
2 86 264 ,7 1266 
24 48 262 385 
The velocity being as the number of turns, we fhall 
have. 
by max. ift, 262 : 264,7 :: 387 : 389 
and by max. 3 d, ^ 7 3 96 : I304} :: 1166 =394 
Difference - - - 5 
The effed therefore of N°. 24. compared with N°. 
2. is lefs than by the prefent maxim in the ratio of 
78 : 79. 
The foregoing, and three other fimilar examples, 
are comprifed in the following Table. 
Examples, 
