66 
Psyche 
[Sept -Dec. 
spots (in M 2 , M 3 and Cu x ) and slightly deepening towards 
apex. Underside as in male. 
Male, holotype, female, allotype, and two males, paratypes, 
placed in the American Museum of Natural History. Taken 
during a brief visit to Grand Canon, Ariz., South Rim, on June 
9th, 1941 (bright cold morning after snow and rain). They 
were weakly fluttering beside the trail together with a few 
Coen, tullia jurcae — almost no other butterflies about. Named 
in honor of Miss Dorothy Leuthold who kindly kicked up the 
first specimen. Female, paratype, labelled “Grand Cy., June 
11th ’30”, ex Coll, of C.F. dos Passos, Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 
Neonympha dorothea edwardsi n. subsp. 
Male. Exp. 20.2. Upperside: brown tint somewhat lighter, 
with much greater amount of duller fulvous red diffused in 
both wings. Secondaries: spots reduced to two, in M 3 and M 2 
(visible also in Cu x in some specimens). Underside: striae 
somewhat more abundant and conspicuous on both wings. 
Primaries: pale fulvous brown with light reddish wash in lower 
part; praeterminal line quite clear as a row of dots. Sec- 
ondaries: fulvous brown; beyond second discal line correspond- 
ingly paler than in dorothea dorothea. Cinereous border 
somewhat less developed, i.e. not approaching as close to arched 
but slightly thinner second discal in M 3 and M 2 , thus leaving a 
narrow but distinct stretch of ground color in between. 
Female. Exp. 20.7. Upperside pale reddish brown but lack- 
ing the pinkish tone of dorothea dorothea — a slight but dis- 
tinct character connecting it with transitions to the fulvous 
southern race or races. 
Male, holotype, labelled: “Gila Co. Ariz. June 1902, O. C. 
Poling”, ex A. G. Weeks Coll., Museum of Comparative Zool- 
ogy, Cambridge, Mass.; female, allotype, “Ariz. 1892, C. J. 
Paine”, Mus. Comp. Zool. Paratypes: 3 males “Gila Co. Ariz. 
June 1902, O. C. Poling”, ex A. G. Weeks Coll., Mus. Comp. 
Zook; 2 males and 1 female “Ariz. 1892, C. J. Paine”, Mus. 
Comp. Zook; male and female, from “Ariz a ”, wrongly labelled 
“ Henshawi M” in Edwards’ hand, ex Edwards’ Coll., Carnegie 
Museum (it is the female of this pair that Holland figures as 
“ henshawi Edw., male” with the remark “much like N . gemma, 
but considerably larger and decidedly reddish upon the upper- 
side”; 1 male “Water Canon, N. Mex., 5,000 ft. August ’81, 
