1969] 
Lindroth — Ground Beetles 
353 
his concept of faunus was, however, composite: a cf in the Paris 
Museum, with two green Dejean labels: (a) “Faunus Say” and (b) 
“D. Say,” belongs to pensylvanicus DeG. and should not be used for 
lectotype. A cf from Pennsylvania designated as neotype , and the 
state as type area (Lth., 1968). — Ilarpalus faunus [Lth., 1968, 
P- 759]- 
1956 Harpalus herbivagus (1823b: 29). No type area given. The 
impunctate basal foveae of prothorax are mentioned in the description, 
and the interpretation is therefore rather conclusive. A cf from Rum- 
ney, N. H., designated as neotype , and the place as type loc. (Lth., 
1968). — Harpalus herbivagus [Lth., 1968, p. 794]. 
2009 Harpalus vulpeculus (1823a: 30). No type area given. 
Say’s description seems to be decisive. A cf from Washington, D.C., 
designated as neotype ? and the place as type loc. (Lth., 1968). — 
Trichotichnus vulpeculus [Lth., 1968, p. 818]. 
2010 (.syn.) Harpalus iricolor (1834: 432). This is a nomen 
nudum without formal description. Say (1. c.), by some mistake, 
refers to a “ Harpalus iricolor ’ as described by him and being the 
same as dichrous Dej. (1829), that is, a Trichotichnus. 
2015 (? syn.) Harpalus iripennis (1823b: 30). No type area 
given. The name has been interpreted according to coll. Lee. (MCZ) 
who considered it identical with his own Selenophorus varicolor. It 
is a species with strikingly large head and impunctate elytral striae,* 
the penis is very characteristic (see Lth., 1968). S. depressulus Csy., 
a supposed synonym in Leng (1920), is a distinct species. A cf 
(with dissected genitalia) from Enterprise, Fla., designated as neo- 
type , and the place as type loc. — Selenophorus iripennis [Lth., 1968, 
p. 823]. 
2051 Harpalus hylacis (1823b: 31). No type area given. Say’s 
description of the pro- and meso-tarsi (though no correlation with 
sex is stated) seems to make the interpretation reliable. A cf from 
Dorchester, Mass., designated as neotype , and the place as type loc. 
(Lth., 1968). — Gynandropus hylacis [Lth., 1968, p. 821]. 
2070 Harpalus carbonarius (1823b: 32). No type area given. 
Since Say mentions the red spot on frons, the pubescence of the pro- 
sternum, and the depressed sides of the prothorax, his description 
must be regarded as conclusive. A cf from Camden, S. C., designated 
as neotype , and the place as type loc. (Lth., 1968). — Anisodactylus 
(Triplectrus) carbonarius [Lth., 1968, p. 848]. 
2071 Harpalus rusticus (1823b: 32). No type area given. The 
current interpretation of Say’s name is somewhat dubious. The 
palpi are described as “reddish-brown” and the margins of prothorax 
