Table 2. Comparison of Leonomyrma spinosa Arnoldi with Chalepoxenus muellerianus Menozzi and C. kutteri Cagniant. 
Characters $ L. spinosa C. kutteri C. muellerianus 
124 
Psyche 
[Vol. 94 
~0 
CD 
M 
c3 
2 
>> 
T3 rs 3 
.2 £ 3 
* c 
2 « 
43 D 
C/a • •— > 
„ o 
3 13 
3 g 
u 
cx 
13 
£ 
13 
c/a 
t-. 
cd 
o 
o 
>. 
T3 
O 
x> 
D 
T3 
D 
M 
c3 
6 
5^ 
O 43 
O 
u 
cx 
3 
J3 
3 
Ui 
o 
T3 :2 0 u 
.2 £ iS 3 
-c 
43 
D 
.2 x 
o 
o 
'1 
G 
'cx 
3 2 
cd O 
*■* 
«s 
c/a 
— 43 
3 
13 
i-i 
>> 
to -O 
c 
D 
> 
a 
c/3 
c 
(D 
> 
O 
e «> 
2 43 
> 
-3 
-G 
O 
Ih 
00 
G 
D 
> 
>> 
43 
D 
D 
cd 
c 
O 
3 
43 
43 
'% 
D 
c/a 
t-i 
cd 
.00 
cn 
u 
cd 
43 
O 
ID 
CX 
c/a 
c/a 
, . 
CX 
D 
T3 
o 
00 
15 
d" 
O 
g 
t-l 
.o 
G 
IS 
D 
3 
3 
jS 
O 
G 
13 
cd 
.52 
‘C 
D 
00 
U 
c 
(h 
D 
00 
u 
cd 
cx 
c 
D 
•o 
-3 
.G 
c 
cd 
(3 
O 
i i 
G 
D 
> 
£ 
c 
o 
8 .9 
Pu Pu 
cd cd {- .2 
cx 
2 
o 
c 
'cx 
pp 
longitudinally wrinkled, epinotum, petioles, gaster except gaster 
epinotum wrinkled, postpetiole smooth, shining 
shining 
