1983] 
Carpenter — Euhleptus 
85 
Figure 2. Euhleptus danielsi. Venational diagram of fore and hind wings. SC, 
subcosta; R, radius; RS, radial sector; MA, anterior media; MP, posterior media; 
CUA, anterior cubitus; CUP, posterior cubitus; A1 and A2, anals. Drawing based 
mainly on specimen PH 15 Paul Harris collection, with some details from specimens 
PE32046 and PE32045. 
the specimen in 1965 only the reverse half could be found."* Having 
now examined many additional specimens, I am convinced that 
both Handlirsch and I incorrectly interpreted several of the vaguely 
indicated structures in the type. Most of the cross veins that I de- 
scribed and figured are obviously wrinkles in the wing membrane; in 
the well-preserved specimens discussed below the cross veins are as 
strongly developed as the longitudinal veins. Also, the structures 
that 1 considered to be pronotal lobes are, in part, the large eyes to 
which Handlirsch referred. The pronotal lobes are indeed present 
but they are small. 
Handlirsch’s Athymodietya parva, described in 1911 from a sin- 
gle, poorly preserved specimen (YPM 18ab) in the Peabody Museum 
^According to the records of the National Museum, counterparts of some of the 
Daniels specimens were kept by Mr. Daniels after Handlirsch had studied them; 
their present location is unknown. 
