90 
Psyche 
[Vol. 90 
10. Daniel Damrow collection. No. 236. Pit Eleven. Good 
preservation of basal part of wings; thorax strongly compressed; 
entire head well preserved in front view, showing beak, with excel- 
lent preservation. 
1 1. Joseph Pohl collection. No. MPH8. Pit Eleven. Good preser- 
vation of basal parts of all four wings, with general features of body. 
12. Helen and Ted Piecko collection. No. 402. Pit Eleven. Fair 
preservation of basal parts of all wings, but body not clear. 
13. Helen and Ted Piecko collection. No. 422. Pit Eleven. Good 
preservation of most of all four wings and parts of thorax and 
abdomen. 
14. Helen and Ted Piecko collection. No. 432. Pit Eleven. Fair 
preservation of body and of basal portions of all wings. 
15. Helen and Ted Piecko collection. No. 436. Pit Eleven. Poor 
preservation of wings and body. 
16. Richard Rock collection, no. 729. Pit Eleven. Good preserva- 
tion of body and of basal parts of fore and hind wings. 
17. Richard Rock collection. No. 817. Pit Eleven. Good preserva- 
tion of basal parts of wings, poorly preserved body. 
A composite drawing of Eubleptus danielsi is given in figure 8. 
The general habitus of the insect, as drawn, is based on the Paul 
Harris specimen, PH 15 (see figures 3 and 4), but details from other 
fossils have been added, as follows (the numbers refer to the speci- 
mens in the above lists): head, PE22016, Wolff 229, Damrow 236; 
beak, PE22016, Damrow 236; pronotum, YPM 18; mesothorax and 
metathorax, PE32046,YPM 18; fore leg, Wolff 229; abdomen, PE32046, 
PE22016; ovipositor, PE22016; cerci, PE32046,PE22016; wings, 
PE32046,PE32045, Wolff 229, HTP 422. All structures shown in the 
composite drawing are present in one or more of the fossils studied.^ 
Discussion of the Structure of Eubleptus danielsi. 
Head: The head of danielsi was obviously hypognathous. In the 
specimens preserved in dorsal view (i.e., PH 15, figure 2) there is a 
distinct hole in the matrix, at about the center of the insect’s head, 
marking the point at which the beak penetrated the matrix; and in 
^Handlirsch’s restoration of Eubleptus, based on the unique type (1920), bears little 
resemblance to the insect in this composite drawing. 
