1945] Chrysopidae of Central America 147 
area; costals and radials wholly dark; pronotum not margined 
with reddish 32 
Palpi not marked with dark, costals and radials less dark; 
wings rather slender 33 
32. Pronotum with a pair of submedian dark stripe . incerta 
Pronotum without any stripes leptana 
33. Margin of pronotum reddish 34 
Margin of pronotum not reddish 35 
34. Cheeks with reddish mark; basal joint of antennae red- 
dish lateralis 
Cheeks not marked claveri 
35. Inner and outer gradates very close to each other, and 
parallel everes 
Gradates widely separated, inner sloping upward, and not 
parallel everina 
Species that I have not recognized in the material and could 
not place from the descriptions and notes, some of which are 
probably synonyms. 
Chrysopa sanguinea Navas 1927, near to caligata , but it does 
not agree in various points. 
Chrysopa rubricosa Navas 1914, the figure shows marks on 
head that I have not seen in any species. 
Chrysopa effusa Navas 1911, may possibly be Ch. gradata ; 
the latter has some of the branches of cubitus as Navas figures 
for effusa, but the divisory cell is not dark. 
Chrysopa guatemalteca Navas 1914 is very near Ch. sarta 
Bks. There are fewer gradates in sarta than stated for guate- 
malteca, and sarta has no dark in hind wing, and antennal 
stripe broad. If the same, guatemalteca has a month or more 
priority. 
Chrysopa bouvieri Navas 1923 and Ch. diver gens Navas 1931 
according to description and Smith’s notes must be very similar 
if not identical ; those we have agree possibly a little better with 
diver gens. 
Chrysopa bulbosa Navas 1926 will run in the key to Ch. in- 
fausta; however, there is nothing unusual about the basal joint 
of antennae in infausta; and infausta has the stripe on basal 
joint lateral, not dorsal, the pronotum not margined, etc. 
