148 Psyche [Sept. -Dec. 
Chrysopa cajensis Navas 1930 in table goes to yucatanensis 
and I consider it the same. 
Chrysopa hieronyma Navas 1917 seems to be tetrasticta. 
Chrysopa obesa Navas 1929. A broad bodied species with 
wholly green wings; may be a Nadiva but not N. balboana. 
Chrysopa senior Navas 1927, wing 20 mm. long, is different 
from any I have. 
Chrysopa morrisoni Navas 1914, veins all green, has dark 
dots or lines on vertex or pronotum, and thus readily separated 
from the all green veined species known to me. 
Chrysopa varicosa Navas 1914 is stated to have a dark lunule 
below each antenna, and peculiar modifications of certain vein- 
lets of the inner gradates; I have seen similar modifications in 
one species, but that species has no lunules on face, nor does it 
agree otherwise with the description of Navas, so it is probably 
also a distinct species. 
Chrysopa lajoni Navas 1911, and Ch. nativa Navas 1911, 
both from Costa Rica and fore wings 17 mm. long, do not fit 
anything I have seen. 
Chrysopa sulcata , Ch. salleana , Ch. ceratica of Navas and Ch. 
explorata Hagen belong to Nodita; Ch. dolicharthra Navas is a 
Meleoma. 
Chrysopa externa var. marginata Navas 192 7, from Guate- 
mala, is described in one line and a half. The pronotum is 
marked on the anterior middle with dark red; I have not seen it. 
Chrysopa josephina Navas 1926 is said to have twelve joints 
of antennae black, and outer gradates bordered; it agrees fairly 
well with what I have as berlandi , but here the gradates are not 
bordered, but this is not always dependable. 
Chrysopa josephina Navas 1930, appears to be Ch. angusta 
Navas. 
Chrysopa longicella Navas 1914; I identify^ this with Ch. 
bimacidata McClendon, described from southern Texas; I have 
specimens from Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Canal Zone; except 
for minor details and size there is little to separate this from 
tolteca Bks. and so I have united them. Ch. valida from Baja 
California is closely related and with more material may prove 
to be the same. 
