68 Psyche [Sept.-Dee. 
Renjifo). — The species was originally described by Macquart 
from the temperate regions of “New Grenada/’’ which may have 
meant Colombia. 
*60. Dichelacera (Psalidia) fulminea (Hine). Synonyms: Ta- 
li anus fulmineus Hine, 1920; Tabanus festivus Hine, 1920, not 
of Wiedemann, 1828; Psalidia ocellata Enderlein, 1925; pos- 
sibly also Bellardia furcata Bigot, 1892 (described without lo- 
cality), which name is antedated in Dichelacera by Dichelacera 
(Psalidia) jurcata (Wiedemann, 1828). 
Boyaca: Muzo, the type locality of Psalidia ocellata (also 
collected by J. Bequaert and by A. Gast). — Enderlein’s addi- 
tional locality “Bogota” probably was only the place from which 
the specimen was shipped to Europe. 
61. Dichelacera (Psalidia) cinnamomea (Schiner). Synonyms: 
Tabanus cinnamomeus Schiner, 1868; and, according to Kro- 
ber (1931), Chelommia fibulata Enderlein, 1922 and 1925. 
Schiner’s specific name is not duplicated by the earlier Tabanus 
cinnamoneus Doleschall, 1858, which is spelled otherwise. 
Enderlein’s types of C. fibulata came from Colombia: Guay- 
abal (Valle del Cauca) ; Cartago (Valle del Cauca) ; and Alto 
do Muelas (Perror for Alto de las Mulas; not located). — Not 
seen by us. 
62. Dichelacera (PPsalidia) peruviana (Macquart). Synonym: 
Tabanus peruvianus Macquart, 1848. 
Krober (1931c) records this species from Colombia, without 
more definite locality. — Not seen by us. 
Dasychela Enderlein, 1922 
(Dicladocera Enderlein, 1922 ; not of Ad. Lutz, 1912) 
The generic name Dicladocera was first proposed on p. 29 of 
an anonymous pamphlet published at Rio de Janeiro in 1909, 
with the title: “Institute Oswaldo Cruz em Manguinhos, Rio de 
Janeiro.” 1 The author of the name was certainly Ad. Lutz, as 
he repeated this and other generic names proposed in the pam- 
phlet in his later publications. No characters were mentioned 
in 1909, but the following seven described species were in- 
cluded: “D. immaculata Macquart, D. furcata Wiedemann 
1 Krober’s (1940) statement that “Dr. Lutz established this genus in 1900, in 
Mem. Inst. Osw. Cruz, p. 29” is erroneous. Krober’s method of determining the 
genotype by elimination is no longer the accepted procedure. 
