Ch. 14— State Regulation of Animal Use • 331 
to Animals v. Board of Education of City of East 
Orange, 91 N.J. Super. 81, 219 A.2d 200 (1966), 
aff'd. 227 A. 2d 506 (1967). 
92. New Jersey Statutes Annotated , Sections 4:22-15 
to 4:22-26 (West 1973 &, Cumulative Annual 
Pocket Part 1984). 
93. New York Laws, Article 26, Section 353 (McKin- 
ney 1972, 1975 & Cumulative Annual Pocket Part 
1984). 
94. North Carolina General Statutes, Section 19A-37 
(1969, 1975 & Cumulative Supplement 1981). 
95. Ohio Revised Code Annotated, Sections 955.16- 
955.18 (Page 1958, 1964, 1968, 1969, 1975, 1979 
&, Supplement 1982). 
96. Oklahoma Statutes Annotated, Title 4, Sections 
391-399 (West 1958 &, Cumulative Annual Pocket 
Part 1984). 
97. Pennsylvania Statutes Consolidated Annotated , 
Sections 459-201 to 459-218 (Purdon 1971, 1973 
&, Cumulative Annual Pocket Part 1984). 
98. Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Company, 435 U.S. 151, 
156 (1978). 
99. Rhode Island General Laws, Section 4-19-12 (1956 
&, Pocket Supplement 1984). 
100. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corporation, 331 U.S. 
218 (1947). 
101. Rowan, A.N., Of Mice, Models, & Men: A Critical 
Evaluation of Animal Research (Albany, NY: State 
University of New York Press, 1984). 
102. Samuels, W., "Massachusetts Loses; Michigan 
Wins; Animal Welfare Bills Total 78,” Physiolo- 
gist 27:73, 1984. 
103. South Dakota Compiled Laws Annotated, Sections 
34-14-6 to 34-14-15 (1967 &, Pocket Supplement 
1984). 
104. State v. Stockton, 85 Ariz. 153, 333 P.2d 735 
(1958). 
105. State v. Kaneakua, 61 Hawaii 136, 597 P.2d 590 
(1979). 
106. Taylor, D., Attorney for U.S. Surgical Corpora- 
tion, Washington, DC, personal communication, 
Aug. 3, 1984. 
107. Tennessee Code Annotated, Sections 44-17-109 to 
44-17-116 (1975 &, Cumulative Supplement 1984). 
108. The Fund for Animals, "Fund Sues Los Angeles 
County,” 16(4), 1983. 
109. Tischler, J., "Rights for Nonhuman Animals: A 
Guardianship Model for Dogs and Cats,” San 
Diego Law Rev. 14:484-506, 1977. 
110. Townsend v. Swank, 404 U.S. 282, 292 (1971) 
(Burger, C.J., concurring). 
111. U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8, clause 18. 
112. U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 10, clause 1. 
113. U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Agriculture, 
Nutrition, and Forestry, Improved Standards for 
Laboratory Animals, hearing on S. 657, July 20, 
1983, Serial No. 98-470 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. 
Government Printing Office, 1984). 
114. United Press International, “Group Protests Re- 
search on Animals,” June 19, 1984. 
115. U. Colo. Law Rev., Note, “Federal Preemption: A 
New Method for Invalidating State Laws Designed 
to Protect Endangered Species,” 47(2):261,265- 
268, 1976. 
116. Utah Code Annotated , Sections 26-26-2, -3, (1981) 
and 76-9:301 (1981), 1984 Cumulative Pocket Sup- 
plement. 
117. Virginia Code, Sections 18.2-403.1 to 18.2-403.3, 
and 29-213.36 to 29.213.100 (1975) as added by 
Chapter 492, Acts of 1984. 
118. Wiggins, C., "Federalism Balancing and the Burger 
Court: California’s Nuclear Law as a Preemption 
Case Study,” U.C. Davis Law Rev. 13(l):l-87, 1979. 
119. Winkler v. Colorado Department of Health, 193 
Colo. 170, 564 P.2d 107 (1977). 
120. Winters, M., "Cetacean Rights Under Human 
Laws,” San Diego Law Rev. 21:911-940, 1984. 
121. Wisconsin Statutes Annotated, Section 174.13 
(West 1979 & Cumulative Annual Pocket Part 
1984). 
122. Wise, S., "Law-Medicine Notes: The Use of Ani- 
mals in Research” Getter to the editor), N. Engl. 
J. Med. 311: 337, 1984. 
123. Wolsch, R., Memorandum to D. Fisher, U.S. Sur- 
gical Corporation, Norwalk, CT, Nov. 9, 1981. 
124. Zurvalec, L., "Use of Animals in Medical Research: 
The Need for Governmental Regulation,” Wayne 
Law Rev. 24(5):1733-1751, 1978. 
