r 169 ] 
table. Of which the fum for one year is 22867." 
But if we fuppofe, that there are 2000 more burials 
yearly than in the bills, on account of diffenters of 
all denominations, and thofe burials that are carried 
out of town, and not accounted for, as has been 
mentioned in my letter laft year, concerning the num- 
ber of inhabitants j the whole number of burials will 
then be 24867 yearly. And we muft take the pro- 
portional parts of 2000, and add them to the num- 
bers of burials at the different ages, which will give 
all the burials at each; and the numbers fo aug- 
mented will ftand as in the 3d column. And if we 
likewife take the numbers of the dead, at the fame 
periods at Brellau, they will be as in the 4th column. 
The numbers in the firfl denote the years. 
2 
81 lO 
8819 
202 
2— y 
1845 
2006 
88 
5—10 
741 
805 
57 
10 — 20 
682 
1 
741 
61 
20 — 30 
15)04 
2070 , 
69 
30—40 
2301 
2502 
87 
40—50 
2397 
2604 
lOI 
yo — 60 
1881 
204y 
103 
60 — 70 
T481 
1610 
loi 
70 — 80 
^053 
1145 
97 
80 — 90 
474 
33 
Sums 
22867 
24862 
999 
Now when we confider the feries of numbers, re- 
prefenting the dead at London, it feems plain, that 
above 20 years of age it is unnatural; and therefore 
VoL. 49. Z cannot 
