[ 204 ] 
no other legion here at that time, with which it could 
have been incorporated. For the other three, which 
continued longer among us, namely, the legio 
cunda Augujia, legio nona, and legio vicejima valens 
vtanx remained diftindt afterwards, and are all par- 
ticularly mentioned by thofe different names. 
I fhall only obferve further, that as there are two 
legionary foldiers named in this and the firfl infcri- 
ption, mention is there made of the tribe, to which 
each of them belonged, as Roman citizens j whereas 
in Horlley we have the monuments of three foldiers 
of the kgto fecunda Augujia^ without any mention of 
their tribes ( i ). There is indeed at Bath an infcri- 
ption of another foldier, faid to have belonged to the 
legio Jecunda adjutrtXy whofe tribe is there exprefled. 
But as that legion does not appear to have ever been 
m Britain, he may be fuppofed to have come hither 
for his health, for which reafon it might be thought 
proper to mention that circumftance. And perhaps 
the moft probable way of accounting for the fame 
thing, in relation to the perfbns nominated in the firR 
and laR of thefe infcriptions now under confidera- 
tion, may be to fuppofe, that the charadter here 
given of the former, as benejiciarius legati principal 
hs, might occafion that regard being paid to his me- 
mory in this funeral monument. And the latter 
might come over on fome particular occafion, not 
here rnentioned, while the legio (^uartadecima gemina^ 
to which he belonged, was Rationed elfewhere. But 
fevefal gentlemen in that neighbourhood defigning 
(1) xxxiii, Monum. I. Midd, I, 
fhortly, 
