C '293 ] 
From this monument Montfaucon concludes, that 
as it contains only three female figures, the Sukvae 
and Campejires were the fame godefifes j tho the ori- 
gin of the former name, as he fais, is not known ( i ). 
Nor indeed did the name irfelf, fo far as I can find, 
any where appear, but in that infcription, till the late 
difcovery of this altar at Bath. And I cannot but 
think with that learned writer, that the fame deities 
were intejuded by both thofe appellations. Tho I do- 
not apprehend, that Sulevae and Campejires were in 
all refpedts fynonymous names, and of equal extent 
in their fignification ; but that Campejires was the 
common name of thofe rural godeffes, who were 
diftinguifiied by particular titles in different places, 
where they were worfhiped as tutelar deities. Hence 
we have an altar in Gruter, infcribed to them only 
by the general name of Campejires, without any ad- 
ditional title there given them (2). 
The two next words Svlinvs Scvltor muft, I 
think, {land for the names of the perfon, who dedi- 
cated this altar ; as the two following, Brvceti f. 
acquaint us with that of his father. Had the word 
Scultor been fo writen thro a miftake for fculptor, and 
defigned to fignify his imployment; it fhould, ac- 
cording to the ufual form of fuch infcriptions, have 
been placed after his father’s name ; as in this fol- 
lowing given us by Reinefius : Jonji Optimo MaximOy 
et Dianae ViSirici SanSiae^ Lucius Valerius Lucil 
(1) V Anttq, expUc. To?n, i.pag, 411, and Suppkm> Tom, 'upy.2^6* 
(2) Pag^ Mxv. Num, 2. 
fdius-y 
