276 Identity of the Tordmanas of Hr an and Kashmir. [No. 3, 
VI. ***T. *nfr^T(16)'«nfa Wui: 
sRifoRRr li wsf w^t : 
^*<tt R ’em* 
VII. *** TrR ^ URT^Rfaj Tzva^- 
^FfHt W?I ¥Rf<T — WMTCff^fcfefci 
*trai r %snrfci'srf*m*r r * * 
VIII. *** — | (17) f^€riwis 
trshi f^^R^wfR^facfcri7 ^riqtf rcfsr *ft- 
wift^^fsiJT flwf^wR^T ^f^TR (18) 
IX. *** ^*§n * ?: * ^ 11 
SI 
(1.) Having had an opportunity of shewing my reading of the inscription 
to Colonel A. Cunningham, I avail myself of this opportunity to express my 
obligations to that learned antiquarian for his many valuable suggestions. A 
few of his amendments I have not been able to adopt, but I shall point them 
out in this and the following notes. 
He takes the first visible letter of the inscription to be p. I assume it to 
be ti which with the two missing letters before it, which I maintain were j and g, 
just make the word jagati ‘ on the earth.’ 
(2.) BUarn and not nttam according to Col. C. 
(3.) The u is distinct after which there is space enough for four letters, 
which I conjecture were udayagiri. 
(4.) The letter «f is interlined. 
(5.) Col. C. takes the m for a sh. 
(6.) The sibilant is wrong ; it should be vf. 
(7.) Col. C. reads this part QrastacJiaJcorte, but the measure won’t admit 
of it. The loss of three syllables at the beginning of the line prevents any 
satisfactory translation of the entire foot. 
(8.) I am indebted to Col. C. for this lection. The word, however is not cor- 
rect, grammatically, it should be iapta. 
(9.) XTIfSJWra recte. 
(10.) The letter t is given below the line. 
(11.) For Usjfrij«r, Col. C. reads I Hie mean- 
ing of the clause is my guide. 
(12.) for 1 
(13.) rf from para “ enemy,” and dama “ to subdue.” Col. C. reads it 
It may be laradeva “ the noblo deva,” but the meaning of the word 
