_ [ 2 5 2 ] 
stlites, for latvm, lites, in fupport of his 
afiertion. But here st, not limply s, is added to l, 
the firft radical letter, as an obfolete adje&ion, by- 
no means elfential to the word ; whereas, in his 
Etrufcan name of Pa 3 ftum( 23 ), st, not s, precedes l, 
by no means as an extrinfic addition, but as appertain- 
ing to the radix, and confequently as an elfential part 
of the name. This therefore by no means comes up 
to the point. The proof is altogether as prepofterous 
as the thing to be proved. But as I have already ex- 
ceeded the limits I at fir ft propofed to myfelf in this 
paper, it is time to conclude ; which you will per- 
mit me to do, with alluring you that I am. 
Dear Sir, 
Your very faithful, 
and moll obedient humble fervant, 
Chr sep?ri’ 7 6°r n - j° hn Swint °«> 
(23) Id, ibid, p. 15, 
XXXVIII. Re- 
