50 
Julius v. Pia. 
(1876). Amahh. oxynotus Tate und Blake, pag. 291 
1879. Amm. oxynotus Reyn^s, Taf. 46. Fig. 1 ( v0n • 
Amalth. oxynotus Wright, pag. 887, Ta . 4 ig- • 47 _49. 
iBII , oxynohiB Quenstedt Ammoniten, pag. 1/6, Taf. 22. **g. 
A,nn, oxynotus compressus ibid Taf 22, Fig. 3^39. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ g p . g ^ 
Ox. oxynotum Geyer, pag. 231, Ia . 0 
Amahh. oxynotus p. p. Böse, pag. 744. 
Ox. oxynotum Hug, pag. 3. Taf. 10. Fig. 3-6. 
,903-06. «feita. p. p. Pal. univ. 1. Kr. 26, T> ,non T>) 
1907. Os. osynotw* Pompeckj, pag. 217 und 280, Nr. 29 und 31. 
1908. Ox. oxynotum Knapp. 
91909? Ox. oxynotum Trauth, Grestener Schichten, pag. 132. 
1909. Ox. oxynotum Rosenberg, pag. 282. 
1914. Ox. oxynotum var. hierlatziea diese Arbeit pag. 26. 
1881. 
1885. 
1885. 
1886. 
1894. 
1899- 
WM 
1. D = 90 
2. D = 2-65 
3. D= 9-9 
4. D = 16-2 
5. D = 54-3 
6. D = 14 6 
7. D = 16 0 
8. D = 20 5 
9. D = 353 
10. D = 44-6 
11. D = 38-2 
12. D = 58-5 
13. D= 9 
14. D = 12 
15. I) — 18 
16. D = 18 
17. D = 22 
18. D = 25 
19. D = 31 
20. D = 39 
21. D = 40 
Abmessungen : 
a ) Nach Wright: 
7. 
°/o 
0 1 
'0 
h = 57 
o 
II 
n = 20 
b) Nach Knapp 
h = 36 
b = 52 
n = 33 
h = 40 
CO 
II 
.O 
n = 33 
h =47 
b = 24 
n = 24 
h = 53 
b= 18 
n = ? 
Nach schwäbischen Exemplaren: 
h = 49 b = 22 
n = 22 
h = 44 
b = 29 
n = 29 
h = 46 
b = 25 
n = 26 
h = 50 
b = 20 
n = 18 
h = 53 
b = 19 
n = 14 
d ) Nach englischen Exemplaren: 
h = 51 b = 19 
n- 16 
h = 51 
b = 18 
n = 16 
e) Nach Geyer: 
h = 46 b = 36 
n = 23 
h = 48 
b = 27 
n = 26 
h = 53 
b = 27 
n = 27 
h = 49 
b = 26 
n = 25 
h = 41 
b = 23 
n = 32 
iO 
II 
b = 20 
n = 14 
h = 47 
b = 24 
n = 17 
h = 50 
b = 21 
n = 17 
h = 52 
b = 20 
n = 14 
50 
