CARABID^E. 
231 
The following new genera and species are described : — 
Amphithasus^ p. 32. Of the facies of typical Anchomenus. Am. truncaius, 
p. 23, Ega ; ? also Anchomenus eleganSy Dej. 
Aporesthusj p. 103. Paraglossse not adherent to upper angles of ligula. 
llesembles Diploharpus {Anchom.) in form of head and trophi, but allied to 
the Odontacanthides in form of mentum and truncated elytra, A. anomahts, 
ibid., K. Janeiro. 
Eudalia macleaii, p. 32, N. S. Wales. 
Anchonoderus suhtilis, p. 33, G uatemala ; scahricollisy p. 34, R. Janeiro. 
Laclinophorm Icctus, p. 64, R. Tapajos ; cencicollis^ p. 64, foveatus^ p. 65, 
tibialis and ochropus, p. 66, macrospilus and ornatus, p. 68, Upper Amazons ; 
quadrinus, p. 64, quadrinotatus, p. 65, R. Janeiro; suhmaculatns {^?=iAncJio- 
derus id., Mots., sec. auct.), p. 66, Amazons; pictipennis, p. 67, Mexico. 
Euccsrus sulcatus, striatus, and geminatus, p. 78, lebioidcs and pulchripennis, 
p. 79, R. Tapajos ; sericeus, p. 78, Ega; hilaris, p. 79, St. Paulo. 
Chalybe basalis, p. 80, R. Tapajos ; leucopa, ibid., St. Paulo ; ttimidula, 
P-81, Ega. 
Ega nodicollis, Upp. Amazons, and biloba, R. Tapajos, p. 103. 
Ctenodactylides, 
Leptotrachelus cruciatus, Ega, and bifasciatus, Peru : Bates, 1. <?.’ vii. p. 232, 
spp. nn. 
Galeritides. 
Zuphium numidicum, Luc., is affirmed to be distinct from chewolati, Brulld : 
Fairmaire, Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr. (4) x. p. 369. 
Erypta mastersi, sp. n., Macleay, Tr. Ent. Soc. N. S. W. ii. p. 82, Gayndah. 
Calophcma viridipennis, p. 221, Pebas; foveata, ib., and depressa, p. 222, 
Ega ; glabrata, p. 221, R. Ucayali : Bates, 1. c. spp. nn. 
Polystichus australis, sp. n., Macleay, 1. c., Gayndah. 
Helluonides, 
Gigadema thomsoni, Casteln., = Mad, : id. 1. c. p. 83. 
Helluomorpha glabrata, janus, and oculea, p. 223, subrostrata and linearis, 
p. 224, Amazons : Bates, 1. c., spp. nn. 
Pleuracanthus ebeninus, sp. n., id. 1. c. p. 224, Ega. 
Gigadema politulum, sp. n., Macleay, 1. c., Gayndah. 
Helluosoma mastersi, sp. n., id. ibid., Gayndah. 
Brachinides. 
Brachinus dubius and atripensis [5*c], Ballion, Bull. Mosc. xliii. p. 324, 
Russia, spp. nn. 
Lehiides. 
Chaudoir (ibid. pp. 111-255, xliv. pp. 1-87) monographs, 
this subfamily, which, as recharacterized and restricted by him, 
and in opposition to the views of Lacordaire, he confines to the 
spp. contained in Lehia and Laniprias by Bonelli, rejecting from 
Lacordaire^s 3rd div., of which Lebia is the type, all but 
Bhopdlostyla, Lebia, and Lia, and also Nemotarsus and Plo- 
