LY GiEI CAPSID J3 . 
501 . 
has so considerable a development of that portion, with so great a re- 
duction of the corium. For Anomaloptera setidosa^ Jak. 
Helonotus^ g. n., P. R. Uhler, Bull. U. S. Geol. & Geogr. Survey of 
Terr. i. p. 312. Facies of Henestaris ; no differential characters given, 
Hel. ahhreviatus, sp. n., id. 1. c. p. 313, Canada, and 9 of the N. American 
States. I 
LygoRus {Melanocoryphus) affinis, sp. n., Jakowlelf, 1. c. p. 257, pi. i. 
fig. 1, Caucasus. 
Blissus putoni, sp. n., id. 1. c. p. 156, pi. i. fig. 6, Bogdo and Ryn- 
Pesky, Astracan. 
Proderus crassicornis, sp. n., id. 1. c. p. 260, pi. i. fig. 2, Derbent. 
Plinthisus hungaricus^ sp. n., G. Horvath, 1. c. p. 60, fig. 12, Hungary. 
Pachymeriis validus, sp. n., id. 1. c. p. 72, fig. 13, Hungary. 
Dieuches ragusoij sp. n., A. Puton, Bull. Ent. Ital. vii. p. 255, I. of 
Pantellaria. . 
Emhlethis ciliatus^ sp. n., G. Horvdth, 1. c. p. 81, fig. 14, Hungary. 
Phygadicus hehrcnsi^ sp. n., P. R. Uhler, 1. c. p. 312, California. 
• Anthocorid.®. 
Piezostethus formicetorum^ Boh., from Scotland ; J. W. Douglas & J. 
Scott, Ent. M. M. xi. p. 174. 
Acompocoris, g. n., O. M. Reuter, Bihang till Sv. Ak. Handl. iii. No. 1, 
p. 63. For Anthocoris alpinus^ Zett., inedit, (described, ihid.^ and Verb, 
z.-b. Wien, xxv. p. 88, Semmering), = Temnosthus pygmceus^ var. 5, Rent., 
olim, and T. lucorum, Fall., = A. pygmceus^FsAl. 
Temnostethus crassicornis, sp. n., id. 1. c. p. 64, Algeria. 
Piezostethus Jlavipes^ sp. n., id. 1. c. p. 65, Biskra. 
Anthocoris sihiricus, sp. n., id. Pet. Nouv. (1875) p. 545, Siberia. 
Pachycoleus rufescens, sp. n., J. Sahlberg, Not. Fenn. (n.s.) xi. p. 305, 
Finland. 
Capsid;e. 
Reuter, O. M. Revisio critica Capsinarum, prsecipue Scandinaviae et 
Fenniae. Forsok till de Europaiska Capsinernas naturenliga Ups- 
tallning jamte kritisk Ofversigt af de Skandinaviskt-finska Arterna. 
Akademisk Afhandling, presented to the Philosophical Faculty of 
the R. Alexander’s University in Finland, May 27, 1875. Helsing- 
fors; 1875, 8vo, pp, 1-101 (introductory), 1-190 (descriptive, 
referring only to the Scandinavian species, with synonymy, locali- 
ties, &c.). 
The author adds to the dichotomous difficulties of his treatment by 
introducing the Darwinian hypothesis, classifying [cf. anted, p. 496] 
various members of the group under the general heading of “ Pterygo- 
polymor phas,” with various sub-divisions (e. g., “species pterygo-gynaoco- 
dimorphae,” Lepto pterna dolohraia, L., and others). After a general 
introduction, a list is given of the various plants frequented by the 
species discussed, which are respectively named in connection with them, 
