CHRYSOMELIDiE. 
331 
Pausiris, p. 290. Facies of Colaspidea ; thorax sub-globular, P. rotun- 
dicollis, p. 291, note. Cape of Good Hope. 
Pallena, p. 291. Differs from Eurytus in its pentagonal scutellum, 
conical pronotura, and more elongate form. P. tibialis, ibid, note. Cape 
of Good Hope. 
Macrocoma, p. 292. With long silky pubescence ; differs from Pseu- 
docolaspis in its cylindrical form, less feeble femora, and globular prono- 
tum. M. eriophora, ibid, note. Natal. 
Himera [Duponchel, Lepidopterd], ibid. Squamose ; form of Bro- 
mius. II. squammulosa, p, 293, note, Caffraria, Lake N’Gami. 
Macetes, p. 293. Resembles Himera, but more elongate, and with de- 
pressed pubescence. M. albicans, ibid, note, S. W. Africa. 
Enipeus, p. 294. Facies of Corynodes ; anterior femora toothed. E. 
murrayi, p. 295, note, Old Calabar. 
Edusina, sub-g. of Edusa, Chevr., p. 309, for E. puberula, Boh. 
Edusella, sub-g. of Edusa, ibid., for E. suturalis, note (no locality 
mentioned). 
yl p. 310. ClosOly allied to Cryptocephalus wneus, 
Wiod., and various (unspecified) species of Dermorhytis. 
Tymnes, ibid. Only distinguishable from Abirus by the almost entire 
absence of transverse rugosities behind the shoulders. T. verticalis, 
p. 311, note, S. America, and ? Colaspis longicornis, Mels. 
Olorus, p. 311. Differs from Edusa in the want of pubescence, the 
elytral punctuation, &c. ; hind legs much developed, with appendiculated 
femora. 0. femoralis, p. 312, note, Juthia. 
Argolis, p. 312. Represents Edusa in Brazil ; tibiae dilated at the 
apex, emarginate on the inner side, especially in the front pair. A. 
tibialis, p. 313, note, Brazil. 
Amasia (Doj., characterized), p. 313. Oval, attenuate at both extre- 
mities, with no pubescence ; posterior femora very strongly toothed. A . 
spinipes, p. 314, note, Java. 
HeterotricJius, p. 316. ‘ Myochroites ’ : apical joints of antennae 
strongly dilated. H. balyi, p. 317, note, Juthia. 
Eur[p~\aspis, p. 317. Of no salient character; scutellum wider than 
long, very obtuse behind, with rounded outline. E. vittatus\^-td\, p. 318, 
note, E. Indies. 
Neocles, p. 320. Differs from Myochrous and Dictyneis in its oblong 
prosternum, which is divided into two parts by two deep gutters, con- 
verging behind ; 3rd joint of antennae very long. N. sulcicollis, p. 321, 
note, Sydney. 
Damasus, p. 321. Form regularly cylindrical ; hooks of tarsi bifid. 
D. albicans, p. 322, note, Syria. 
MecisteSy p. 322. Near Pachnephorus ; prosternum subquadrate, with 
two furrows, antennae subclavate, femora weak, linear. M, tarsalis, 
p. 323, note, S. Africa. 
Syagrus, p. 331. ‘ Typophorites ’ : of elongate, subparallel form, 
with subquadrate pronotum and femora strongly toothed beneath. 
Typopliorus buqueti (Dej.), p. 332, note. 
Menius, pp. 332. All the femora toothed beneath, pronotum concave 
