LIST OF PUBLICATIONS. 211 
living.” . This object, appears to be achieved in an interesting and popular 
manner. 
Pavesi, Pietro. [See Canestrini, G.] 
Powell, Llewellyn. On Latrodectus katipoj the poisonous 
Spider of New Zealand (with illustrations). Tr. N. Z. Inst, 
iii. 1870, pp. 56-59. 
Describes the affinities and characteristics of the above spider, and gives 
it the provisional specific name of katipoj’ 
Sanborn, F. G. P. Post. Soc. 1870, xiii. p. 208. 
Pemarks that a great number of Arachnida, mostly of small size, were 
noticed struggling in water of about | inch in depth covering the surface 
of the ice in meadows, and appeared to represent many species.” 
Simon, Eugene. Sur les Araneides de la famille des Enydes, 
qui habitent PEspagne et la Maroc. R. Z. Dec. 1869, 
PP- • 
Forms a new family Enydes out of Lachesis, Savigny, .E?iyo, Sav. (= Clotho, 
Walck. ad partem), and gen. nov. Sim. { — Enyo, Lucas, ad partem), 
Enyo amaranthina^ Luc., being the type of n. g. Miltia. 
— — . Araneides nouveaux on pen connus du midi de FEurope, 
lere Menioire. Mdm. Liege, 1870, pp. 
Characterizes a new genus, Eeltosoma, fam. Epetrides, and describes 49 
new species of various genera and families. 
Thorell, T. Remarks on synonyms of European Spiders. 
Nos. 1 & 2, pp. 1-228. Upsala, London & Berlin. No. 1, 
1870; No. 2, 1871. 
This important work (not yet complete) is, in fact, a continuation of that 
by the same author, on European Spiders (vide Zool. Rec. vi. p. 143), 
which thus forms the introduction to the present work (co7if. Thorell, Europ. 
Spid. p. 234, note). As the object of that was to review the genera of 
European spiders, so the object of the present is to examine and, as far as 
possible, determine the synotiyins, and thus to fix the momenclature of 
the spiders described in Westring’s ^Aranese Suecicse,' as also of some other 
European species, partly described in the ‘ History of British and Irish 
Spiders,’ by J. Blackwall, London, 1801-64, partly registered in the ^ Cata- 
loque synonymique des Araneides d’Europe,’ given by M. Eugene Simon in 
his ‘ Histoire Naturelle des Araign^es,’ Paris, 1864.” 
In the present numbers (1 & 2), which deal primarily with Westring’s 
genera and species, as far as and including the author’s proposition 
has been admirably carried out. The greatest care and honesty has been used 
in determining the identity of species described by various authors ; descrip- 
tions as well as typical examples from different parts of Europe have been 
compared with great pains and acumen ; the specific as well as generic names 
which the author conceives to have the priority are in each case placed 
within brackets immediately after the name borne by the genus or species in 
the work primarily under review ; and not the least valuable part of the lists 
of synonyms is the date^ prefixed to each (both genus and species), at which 
