222 
ZOOLOGICAL LITERATURE. 
(Stimp.), A. Milne-E. p. 221, Loo-Choo. — L. puhescens (Milne-Edw.), A. 
Milno-E. p. 223, Mauritius. — L. longimana, sp. n., A. Milne~E. p. 221, pi. xii. 
fig. 7, Guadeloupe. — L. (jranosimana^ sp. n., A. Milne-E. p. 222, pi. x. fig. 5, 
New Caledonia. 
Carpilodes tristis (Dana), A. Milne-E. p. 225, Archipelago Paumotou. — 
C. (/nmiilatus (Holler), A. Milne-E. p. 220, pi. xii. fig. 5, Nicobar, Taiti. — 
C, ohtusus (Deliaan), A. Milne-E. p. 227, Japan. — C. venosus (Milne-Edw.), 
A. Milne-E. p. 227, pi. xii. fig. 2, Mauritius. The last species the author 
says differs little from this. — C. rugipes (Heller), A. Milne-E. p. 229, pi. xii. 
fig. 4, Ited Sen. — C. rugaUis (Lat.), A. Milne-E. p. 230, pi. xii. fig. 3, Indian 
Ocean and China seas. — C. vaillanlianuSf A. IMilne-E. p. 231, pi. xi. fig. 3, 
Hed Sea. — C. ruhevy sp. n., A. Milne-E. p. 228, pi. xii. fig. 4, Honolulu. — 
C. stimpsoniiy sp. n., p. 232, pi. xi. fig. 2, New Caledonia. 
Lachiopochis rodgersii (Stimpson), A. Milne-E. p. 234, Gaspar Straits. 
Atergatis integerrimus (Lam.), A. Milne-E. p. 235, Japan &c. — A, suh- 
dentatus (Dehaan), A. Milne-E. p. 230, Japan. — A. latissimns (Milne-Edw.), 
A. Milne-E. p. 237, pi. xiv. fig. 1, Indian Ocean. — A. dilatatus (Dehaan), 
A. Milne-E. p. 238, Japan. — A. frontalis (Dehaan), A. Milne-E. p. 238, 
Japan. — A. rcticidatus (Dehaan), A. Milne-E. p. 239, Japan. — A. roseus 
(Riippell), A. Milne-E. p. 239, Red Sea. — A. marginatus (Riippell), A. 
]Milne-E. p. 240, Red Sea. — A. scrub icidatus (Heller), A. Milne-E. p. 242, 
Red Sea. — A.Jioridus (Rumph), A. Milne-E. p. 243, Red Sea and Indian 
Ocean. — A. kevigatns, sp. n., A. hlilne-E. p. 241, pi. xv. fig. 4, Malabar.— 
A. ohtusus, sp. n., A. Milne-E. p. 241, pi. xiv. fig. 4, Cochin-China. — A. 
nitidus, sp. n., A. Milne-E. p. 243, Archipelago of Viti. The author con- 
siders that A. lateralis (Adams & White), A. insularis (Adams & White), 
and A. elegans (Heller) do not belong to this genus, but to that of Xan- 
thina. 
Lophactcea granulosa (Riippell), A. Milne-E. p. 247, Red Sea &c. — L. semi- 
granosa (Heller), A. Milne-E. p. 248, Red Sea. — L. lohata (Milne-Edw.), 
A. Milne-E. p. 249, pi. xvi. fig. 3, Antilles. — L. rotunda (Stimp.), A Milne-E. 
p. 250, California. — L. anaglypta (Heller), A. Milne-E. p. 251, Red Sea. — 
L. cristata, sp. n., A. Milne-E. p. 240, Cochin-China. — L. eydouxii, sp. n., 
A. Milne-E. p. 248, pi. xvi. fig. 2, Sandmch Islands. 
Atergatopsis, g. n.^ A. Milne-E. p. 252, In its general form the carapace 
much resembles that of the genus Caipilius, which has the regions sepa- 
rated by grooves that prolong themselves and divide the latero-anterior 
borders, whilst in this genus the carapace is smooth, without any indications 
of the regions, and the latero-anterior borders are entire. The lateral margins 
are thick, whilst in Atergatis they are thin and prolonged into a kind of sharp 
" plate. In Atergatopsis is a line which borders the anterior portion of the 
carapace. The antennal region differs completely from that of Carpilius, and 
resembles that of Atergatis. The peduncle of the external antenna) is short, 
and united at its antero-internal angle to the infero-frontal surface. The third 
joint of the second pair of gnathopoda is subquadrilateral. The endostoma 
is slender. The legs are round on the upper surface, as in Carpilius, and not 
carinated as in Atergatis. The chelae are subequal, whilst in Carpilius they 
are remarkably unequal and the fingers very short, carrying only two large 
basal teeth upon the cutting-surface. But, in the present genus, the clielte 
are multidentate, and terminate in an extremely sharp apex, and not cochle- 
