LEPIDOPTERA. 
453 
dillera, p. 145, pi. 22. fig. 11 ; Euterpe uricoechece^ p. 147, pi. 23. figs. 11, 12 ; 
E. potainea (Mor. MS.), p. 149; E.philoscia (Mor. MS.), p. 163; E. corcyra, 
p. 169, pi. 23. fig. 8 ; Pieris georgiana, p. 160, pi. 24. figs. 4, 6 ; P. blanca, 
p. 160, pi. 24. figs. 6, 7 ; P. Clementina f p. 162, pi. 25. fig. 6 ; P. zamhoanga, 
p. 162, pi. 24. figs. 2, 3 ; P. phcehe, p. 163, pi. 25. fig. 6 ; P. golathea, p. 165 ; 
P. boisduvalianaj p. 168, pi. 24. fig. 8; P. calymnia, p. 171, pi. 23. fig. 7 
{Euterpe c .) ; P. celia, p. 171 ; P. leucadia (Eiderpe), p. 172 ; P. leucanthe, 
ibid. ; P. cegis, p. 176, pi. 24. fig. 1 ; P. locusta, p. 176, pi. 25. figs. 8, 9 ; P. 
euthemia (Mor. MS.), p. 177 ; P. tovaria (Mor. MS.), p. 178 ; P. olympia, 
ibid. ; P. suadella (Mor. MS.), p. 179; P. diana, p. 180 ; P. sevata (Mor. MS.), 
ibid. ; P. menapia, p. 181, pi. 26. fig. 7 ; Anthopsyche heuglini, p. 186, pi. 25. 
fig. 4 ; Eronia phoc(sa, p. 193, pi. 27. figs. 6, 6 ; Caleidryas rurina 
(Mor. MS.), p. 194, pi. 26. figs. 9-11; Coeias cerbera (Mor. MS.), p. 196; 
C, therapis (Mor. MS.), ibid., pi. 26. figs. 6-8 ; Terias bogotana^ p. 198, 
pi. 26. figs. 3, 4; T. fabiola (Mor. MS.), p. 199; T. limoneus, (Mor. MS.), 
p. 200; T. Salome, p. 201; T. theodes (Mor. MS.), ibid.; T. theona, p. 202; 
T. vitelUna (Mor. MS.), ibid. ; T. platcea, p. 203 ; T. phamicia, p. 205 ; 
T. lydia, p. 206; T. rhodia (Mor. MS.), ibid.; T. medutina (Mor. MS.), 
p. 207 ; T. nisella, ibid. ; T. lerna, p. 212, Amboyna. 
Eronia jobcea (Boisd.). The 5 of this species is also described by C. 8i R. 
Felder, 1. c. p. 193. 
The following Coloradian species are referred to by Reakirt (Proc. Ent. 
Soc. Phil, vi.) chiefly with regard to their variations : — Pieris oleracea (Harr.), 
p. 131 ; P. vernalis (Edw.), p. 132 ; P. protodice (Boisd.), p. 133; P. callidice 
(God.), p. 134; Nathalis iole (Boisd.), ibid., with description of $; Colias 
pliilodice (Boisd.), p. 135 ; C. alexandra (Edw.), ibid. ; and C, eurytlieme 
(Boisd.), p. 136. 
Euterpe swainsonii (G. R. Gray) and E. leucodrosyme (Roll.) are said to 
be (S and 9 of the same species by Butler, on the authority of Bonning- 
hausen. Ann. & Mag. N. II. 3rd ser. xvii. p. 436. 
E. Saunders notices a gynandromorphous specimen of a species of Euterpe 
from Mexico, the right side c? , the left $ . Proc. Ent. Soc. 1866, p. xviii. 
Butler reasserts the distinctness of his Pieris avivolans from Hesperocharis 
graphites (Bates), Proc. Zool. Soc. 1866,. p. 461. — Anthocharis leo (Butl.) = 
var. c? halimcde (King), and Gonepteryx urania (Butl.)=6'. wallichii 
(E. Doubld.) according to Butler, 1. c. p. 452. 
. The female of Pieris polisma (How.) is described and figured by Snellen 
van Vollenhoven, Tijdschr. voor Ent. 1866, p. 59, pi. 1. figs. 3-4. 
ITewitson figures the $ of his Pieris polisma, Exot. Butt. July 1866, 
Pieris, pi. 8. fig. 56. 
Hewitson (Proc. Ent. Soc. 1866, p. xxxv) mentions that Watson has de- 
tected on Pieris thestylis (Doubl.), P. autothisbe (Boisd.), and P. clemanthe 
(Doubl.) a total absence of the plumules which abound on the wings of 
other species. He adds that the costal margin of the anterior wings in these 
species is strongly serrated, and that both he and Wallace had already sepa- 
rated them on this account. 
Leuconea. Lucas (Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr. 4® s^r. v. pp. 601-604) discusses the 
characters on which this genus is founded, and describes a variety of L. 
cratcegi from Pekin, under the name of L. crat(xgoides {1. c. p. 603, pi. 11. 
fig. 11). According to Bellier de la Chavignerie (1. c. p. 504, note), the 
