• ACANTHOPTERYGir. 
p. 313 ; Oxychmtodon (type, Cli. lineolalas, Q. G.) ; and Gonoclioitodon 
(type, Ch. triangulum, K. v. H.), p. 314. He also gives a nominal list of 
the species, which he estimates at rather more than 70. 
The following figures of Chcetodontida: are issued by Bleeker, Atl. Ich- 
thyol. vi. pts. 31 & 32, (Chactod.), pis. i.-xvi., pis. ccclxiii.-ccclxxyiii. of the 
entire work. Toxotes microlepisy Gthr., pi. i. fig. 1, Ephippus arguSj Cuv., 
fig. 2, Toxot&s oligolepi% Blkr., fig. ^Jaculator, fig. 4, chatareus,fig. 6 \ (Hola- 
canthus) Acanthochcetodon nicohariensis, pi. iii. fig. 1, Taurichthys varius, 
C. V., fig. 2, monoceros, Blkr., fig. 3, Harpochirus punctatus^ Cant., fig. 4, 
Ilarches orbis, Cant., fig. 5, Taurichthys chrysostomus, pi. iv. fig. 4, 
Prognathodus longirostris, fig. 5 , Taurichthys macrolepidotus, pi. v. fig. 1, 
Acanthochcetodon imperator^ fig. 2, Holacanthus hisjnnosus, Gthr., pi. vi. 
fig. 1, melanospilus, fig. 2, nox, fig. 3, Chcetodontoplus chrysocephalus, 
fig. 4, Holacanthus diacanthus, Gthr., fig. 5, Chcetodontoplus mclanosoma, 
pi. vii. fig. 1, Chelmon rostratus, Cuv., fig. 2, Holacanthus hicolor, C. V., 
fig. 3, Chcetodontoplus dimidiatus, fig. 4, mesoleucus, Lac., fig. 5, Acantho- 
chcetodon annularis, pi. viii. figs. 1 & 2, striatus, fig. 3, semicirculatus, 
fig. 6, Holocanthus tibiccn, C. V., fig. 4, vroWcii, Blkr., pi. ix. fig. Ij xan- 
thometopon, Blkr., fig. 2, navarchus, C. Y., fig. 3, lamarckii, Lac., Acantho- 
chcetodon lepidolepis, Blkr., pi. x. fig. Holocanthus sexstriatus, K. v. H., 
fig. 2, T'etragonopterus Oxychcetodon) falcula, pi. xi. fig. 1, T. {Ghcxtodon- 
tops') collaris, fig. 2, T. {Lepidochcetodon') Icleinii, fig. 3, T. {Linophora') 
auriga, fig. 4, Holacanthus trimaculatus, Lac., fig. 5, Tetragonopterus 
(Gonochcetodon) triangulum, pi. xii. fig. 1, T. (Chcetodontops) fasciatus, 
fig. 2, T. puflictato-fasciatus, fig. 3, Acanthochcetodon imperator, fig. 4, 
Tetragonopterus {Rhabdophorus) semion, fig. 5, Coradion melanopus, pi. xiii. 
fig. 1, Tetragonopterus {Citharcedus') ornatissimus,fig. 2, T. {Rhabdophorus) 
speculum, fig. 3, Megaprotodon strigangulus, Ifig. 4, T. {Lepidochcetodon') 
unimaculatus, fig. 5, Tetragonopterus {Chcetodontops) melanotus, pi. xiv. 
fig. 1, T. {Rhabdophorus) bennetti, fig. 2, T. octo-fasciatus,fig. 3, T. {Lino- 
phora) rafflesi, fig. 4, Coradion chrysozonus, Kp., fig. 5, Tetragonopterus 
{Rhabdophorus) trifasciatus, pi. xv. fig. 1, T. {Oxychcetodon) lineolatus, 
fig. 2, T. miliaris, fig. 3, Parachcetodon ocellatus, fig. 4, T. {Chcetodontops) 
selene, fig. 6, T. {Linophora) vagahundus, pi. xvi. fig. 1, T. {Rhabdo- 
phorus) ephijjpium, fig. 2, T. {Linophora) xanthurus, fig. 3, Hemitaurich- 
thys poly lepis, fig. 4, Tetragonopterus {Citharcedus) meyeri, fig. 5. 
Chcetodon zoster, Benu. In spite of a different radial formula, Peters 
has recognized this species in K. Mobius’ collection from Mauritius ; 
MB. Ak. Berl. 1876, p. 437. 
Chcetodontoplus, g. n., for Holacanthus septentrionalis, Schl. ;• Bleeker, 
Arch. Neerl. xi. p. 307. 
Acanthochcetodon, g. n., for II . annularis, Lac. ; id. 1. c. p. 308. 
Pomacanthus. Bleeker argues that the appellation Chcetodon, Art., 
should more properly be applied to this genus, as the only Chcetodon- 
tides included by Artedi under the latter name, are Pomacanthi of 
modern authors. He has also come to the conclusion that P. arcuatus, 
L., and P. aureus, Bl., are distinct species. L. c. pp. 178-185. 
Scorpis vinosa, sp. n., Alleyne & Macleay, 1 . c. p. 277, pi. ix. fig. 2, 
Darnley Island. 
