LEPlDOPtERA. 
855 
describes the following new species : — H. hippohj fig. 13, origin not stated ) 
II. hjdara, fig. 14, New Granada ; H. hygiana^ fig. 15, Quito j and II himera, 
fig. IG, Ecuador. 
Ileliconia timareta, Hewitson, Trans. Ent. Soc. 3rd ser. v. p. 663, Ecuador. 
Helicomus novatus, Bates, Trans. Ent. Soc. 3rd ser. v. p. 639, and H. para- 
plesius, Bates, 1. c. p. 540, Maranham and Par^l. 
Heliconius. 0. & R. Felder {1. c.) describe the following new species of 
this genus : — H. cephallenia^ p. 373, Surinam ; II polychrous (Koll. MS.), 
p. 375, pi. 47. fig. 7, Brazil ; H. nattereri, ibid., pi. 47. fig. 8, Brazil ] II 
mcletc, p. 370, and II lindigii, p. 877, pi. 47. fig. 1, Bogota. 
Eiicidcs Xenophanes, Folder, 1. c. p. 877, pi. 40. figs. 14 & 16, Bogot^l. 
Acrmdes. 
C. & R. Felder (Reise der Novara, Zool. ii. Lep. Heft 3) figure the fol- 
lowing species : — Acrcea cresia, pi. 46. figs. 4, 6 ; A. callianthe, pi. 40. figs. 6, 7 j 
A. trinacria, pi. 40. figs. 2, 3 ; and A. erinome, pi. 46. fig. 1. 
Acreea euryta (Linn.). Hewitson (Exot. Butt. 04, Oct. 1807, Acrcea, pis. 
4 k 6. figs. 21-32) figures 12 forms which he regards as varieties of this 
species, 8 of the cf and 4 of the $ . A. vestalis and alcino'4 (Feld.) are 2 
other varieties of the d* . 
Acrcea. 0. & R. Felder (/. c.) describe the following new species of this 
genus : — A. alcinoe, p. 368, pi. 46. figs, 12 & 13, . Island of Bissao ; A. vestalis, 
p. 369, pi. 46. figs. 8 & 9, Guinea ; A. caffra, ibid., pi. 46, figs. 10 & 11, Oaf- 
fraria ; and A. sajie, p. 370, Abyssinia. 
Nymphalides. 
C. & R. Felder (Reise der Novara, Zool. ii. Lep. Heft 3) figure the follow- 
ing species of this group, of which they published diagnoses in the Wiener 
ent. Monatschrift, vi. : — Ccthosia nicobarica, pi. 48. figs. 7, 8; Cirrochroa 
orissa, pi. 49, figs. 7, 8 ; C. fasciata, pi. 49. figs. 9, 10 ; Argynnis diana 
(Cram.), pi. 60. figs. 3, 4 ; A. nerippe, pi. 60. figs. 1, 2 ; Melitcea leanira, 
pi. 60. figs. 13, 14 ; Eresia lencodesma, pi. 60. figs. 11, 12 ; E. cadilla, pi. 60. 
figs. 7-10 ; Faunia olympias, pi. 52. figs. 1,2 ; F, araucana, pi. 52. figs. 9, 10 ; 
Myscelia leucocyana, pi. 63. figs. 8, 9 ', Batesia hypochlora, pi. 63. figs. 1, 2 j 
Catagramma cegina, pi. 63. figs. 12, 13 j Cyane depuiseti, pi. 63. figs. 3, 4 ; 
Cyrestis paulinm, pi. 51. figs. 7, 8 ; Zethera aganippe, pi. 54. fig, 3 ; Z. musa, 
pi. 54, figs. 6, 7 ; Z. hestioides, pi. 64. figs. 4, 5 ; Isodenia adelma, pi. 64. figs. 
1,2; Heteroehroa malea, pi. 67. fig. 7 ; Il.justiJia, pi. 67. figs. 10, 11 ; Neptis 
epira, pi. 66. figs. 9, 10 ; N. ehusa, pi. 56. figs. 7, 8 ; Athyma urvasi, pi. 66. 
fig. 4 ; A.jocaste, pi. 66. figs. 1-3 ; Adol{asninus,-<g\. 68. figs. 4, 6 ; A. panopus, 
pi. 68. figs. 2, 3 ; Apatura rhea, pi. 67. fig. 3 ; A. griseldis, pi. 57. fig. 1 ; 
Nymphalis ehcercmea, pi. 60. fig. 1 ; Sidei'one thehais, pi. 60. figs. 6, 7 ; Eurytela 
castehiaui, pi. 61. figs. 5, 6 ; Ergolis tceniata, pi. 61. figs. 1, 2 ; Melanitis melias, 
pi. Ot. fig. 11 ; and M. egialina, pi. 01. figs. 7, 8. 
Melitcea. Von Ziegler mid Klipphausen have given a tabular synopsis of 
the European species of this genus, taking Staudinger’s Catalogue of 1861 as 
the foundation of his work. He accompanies it with a series of remarks on 
the species (Stett. ent. Zeit. 1867, pp. 418-428). He regards M. latonigena 
(Eversm.) as a distinct species ; M. caucasica (H.-Sch.) is probably distinct 
from didyma\ M. aurinia (Rottenburg) is substituted for artemis on the 
