lepidoptera. 
361 
belongs to the Satyndcc, near Orinoma. Butler figures Dehis diana (Butl.), 
■with the neuration and palpus of DcUs (/. c. pi. 2. figs. 2, 2a, 26), MycaUm ga- 
moliha (Walk. MS.) with its neuration and palpus (/. c, figs. 3, 3a, 36), and 
the neuration and palpus of Orinoma (1. c. figs. 4, 4a). 
Butler also remarks (1. c. pp. 61-54) upon the variations of Cyllo teda 
(Linn.), of wliich he gives indications of 41 forms contained in the collec- 
tion of the British Museum. These include the following described as spe- 
cies: — Pap. solandra, hanksia (Fab.), Cyllo helena (Westw.)^ Pap. ismenC) 
mycena, phedima, arcensia (Oram.), Cyllo taitensis (Feld.). 
Butler (Ann. & Mag. N. II. 3rd ser. xix. p. 161) remarks upon the charac- 
ters of the genus Lasiommata (Westw.) = Parargc (Iliibn.), which he re- 
gards as including several generic types. To Lasiommata pr. Butler refers 
the following species : — L. trgeria and dcjanira (Linn.), tircis (God.), xiphia^ 
roxelana, and clymene (Fab.), and meone (Oram.). The type of HUbner’s' 
genus Dira is a true Lasiommata. Butler figures Lasiommata cogeria and 
the club of its antenna (pi. 4. figs. 2, 2a). He also objects il, c. p. 162 
note) to the adoption of the genus Pararge as proposed by Strom. 
PronopTiila (Westw.). Butler (Ann. & Mag. N. II. 3rd ser. xx. pp. 266-268) 
has subjected the species referred to this group to a revision, which leads 
him to recognize in them 6 distinct genera, 3 of which are characterized as 
now. The others are, bo.sides Prono^diila, Lasiophila (Fold.) and Bccdalmd 
(Hew.). The type oiPronophila is P. thelehe (Westw. & Hew.). 
Butler (Ann. & Mag. N.H. 3rd ser. xix. pi. 3) figures the details of his new 
genus llipparchioideSj and, for comparison therewith, the neuration of the 
hind wing in Lasiommata? (fig. 4) and Satyrus (fig. 6), the club of the an- 
tennoo in the same genera (figs. TO & 11) and the plumules of Lasiommata? ^ 
Satyrus, and Epinephcle (figs. 13-16). 
Butler remarks (Entomologist, iii. pp. 277-281) on the nomenclature of 
the European genera of this group, and proposes some changes. Some of his 
observations are criticised by Kirby (I, c. pp. 291-293 ) ; and Butler replies 
(/. c. pp. 319, 320). 
Butler remarlts that of the two specimens figured by Stephens under the' 
name of Erehia ligea, the S ~E. curyale (Esp.). Ent. M. Mag. iv. p. 151. 
Butler (Ann. & Mag. N. 11. 3rd ser. xx.) characterizes and figures Papilio 
polydecta (Cram.), 1. c. p. 402, pi. 9. figs. 6, 6, which he refers to Mycalesis, 
and also Dehis manthara (Feld.), 1. c. p. 403, pi. 9. fig. 9, referred to Lethe 
(Hubn.). 
C. & K. Felder (Reise der Novara, Zool. ii. Lep. Heft 3) figure the fol- 
lowing species previously described by them : — Antirrhoea philopexmen, pi. 66. 
figs. 3,4; A. lindigii, pi. 66. figs. 1, 2; A. geryon, pi. 67. figs. 1, 2 ; A. Jiela, 
pi. 66. figs. 6, 6 ; Clerome lends, pi. 62. figs. 5, 6 ; Zeuxidia semperi, pi. 62. 
figs. 1, 2 ; Taygetis calliomma, pi. 66. fig. 7 ; I)<xdalma dorinda, pi. 67. figs. 
8, 4 ; Ptychandra lorquinii, pi. 68. figs. 1-3 ; Mycalesis ita, pi. 68. figs. 8, 9 ; 
M, tagaia, pi. 67. figs. 7, 8. 
Enptychia. Butler figures the following species of this genus described 
by him in his monograph published in 1866 (see ‘ Record,’ 1866, p. 463) : — 
E. pagyris,Vxoc,. Zool. Soc. 1867, pi. 11. fig. 1, eegrota, fig. '2, philijjpa, fig. 3, 
metagera, fig. 4, erycina, fig. 6, gemmida, fig. 7, oenus, fig. 8, ohscura, fig. 9, 
pyraemon, fig. 10, junonia, fig. 11, argyrospila, fig. 12, lihyoidea, fig. 13, 
lethe, pi. 12, fig. 1, nehulosa, fig. 2, tvesitcoodii, fig. 3, hicmalis, fig. 4, poly- 
