101 
LOPHOBllANCHII^ PLECTOGNATHI . 
Stif/matophora longirostris^ sp. ii., Hutton, L c. p. 69. — S. loops noticed as 
a !iew species by Castelnau, 1. c. p. 203, ana /S', olivacea, ibid. p. 244, South 
Australia. 
JJrocampns carinirostrisj sp. n., Castelnau, 1. c. p. 200, South Australia. 
[The same species was described by the Recorder at a later period, before he 
became acquainted wdth Castelnau’s paper, as Urocampns ccelorhynchuSf Journ. 
Mus. GodelF. ii. 1873, p. 103.] 
Gastrotoheus gracilis, sp. n,, Klunzinger, Arch. f. Nat. 1872, p. 44, South 
Australia. 
Ilippocajupus tristis is a now name given by Castelnau to a fish of this 
genus from Melbourne. L. c. p. 197. 
PLECTOGNATHI. 
These fishes “ are Physoclysti in all respects.” Cope, Proc. Ac. Nat. Sc. 
Philad. 1871, p. 157. 
^ Balistidcc. Their osteological affinities are with the Acronuridcc. Dareste, 
Compt. Rend. 1872, June 17, pp. 1527-1530 ; A. & M. N. H. 1872, x. pp. 68- 
70; or J. Zool. 1872, pp. 268-272. — “Beitrage zur Osteologie des Genus 
\ Balistes,'' by Klein, Wiirtt. nat. ,) 
Monacanthus forsteri and ilf. pn 
at. JH. 1872, pp. 262-300, Taf. 2. 
prasinus are new names given by Castelnau 
to fishes of this genus frmn Melbourne. Proc. Zool. Soc. Victor. 1872, 
pp. 204 & 205, — IJkewise^Menacflfw^/iMs ferulifer, Castelnau, ibid. p. 245. 
■4 Aracana aniccna is a new name given by Castelnau to a fish of this genus 
from Melbourne. L. c. p. 207. 
vl Jlcmiconiatus gidtifer found at Malaga. Perez Areas, An. Soc. Esp. i. 
p. 4. 
Tetrodon. According to Peters, T> punctaius, Bl. Schn.,= 7’. slcUatm, and 
Chclichthys punctatus, Miill. Tyobc\\.,= T. psittacus. SB. nat. Pr. 1872, 
p. 47. 
Diodon hlochii is a new name given by Castelnau to a fish of this genus 
from Melbourne. L. c. p. 210. 
CYCLOSTOMATA. 
Pctro}nyzon ernstii described as a new species from the Amur by Dybowski, 
Verb. z.-i). Ges. Wien, 1872, p. 220. 
Yarra singularis (g. et sp. n.) and Neomordacia howittii (g, et sp. n.) are 
new forms of Lampreys from South Australia, described by Castelnau, Proc. 
Zool. Soc. Victor. 1872, pp. 231 & 232. 
