LIST OF PUBLICATIONS. 
207 
Kempei,en, L. VON, Verli. z.-b. Wien, xxi. (1871) pp. 18-21. 
Reviews TliorelFs works on the European genera and synonyms of Euro- 
pean Spiders. 
Koch, Ludwig. Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Arachnidenfauna 
Tirols. Z. Eerd. 1872, pp. 239-328. 
Describes 24 species of various genera of Araneidea as new. 
. Die Aracliniden Anstraliens, naeli der Natur beschrieben 
und abgebildet. Niirnberg : 1872, pts. 6 & 7, pp. 249-368, 
pis. xxi.-xxvii. 
These two parts continue the work (see Zool. Rec. viii. p. 198), and in- 
clude four new genera and 66 species of Araneidea^ 40 of the latter being de- 
scribed as new. 
Menge, a. Preussische Spinnen. V. Abtheilung. Schr. Ges. 
Daiiz. pp. 297-326, pis. 54-57. 
The present part includes the genera Dysdcra^ Scgcstria, Gnaphosa, ilfc- 
lanophora^ and Micaria, comprising 17 known and 2 new species. 
Pollock, Frederick. On the habits of some Madeiran Spiders. 
Ann.N. H. (4) x. pp. 271-274. 
Taczanowski, Ladislas. Les Araneides de la Guyane fran 9 aise. 
Hor. Ent. Ross. ix. (1872), pp. 64-111, pis. iii. & iv. 
This paper (incomplete) is a continuation of that noticed in Zool. Rec. viii. 
p. 199. It includes notices and descriptions of 30 species of Arancideii^ of 
which all but two are new, also characters of three new genera of the family 
Thomisidcs — Acanthonotvs^ Isopus, and Senoculus, 
Thorell, Tamerlan. Remarks on Synonyms of European 
Spiders.— No. 4. Upsala : 1872-73, pp. 375-644. 
This Number brings the above valuable work to a conclusion. It com- 
pletes the synonymic remarks on the genus Attus, based on Westring’s 
^ Aranem Suecicae,’ pp. 876-407. This is followed, pp. 407-414, by a list of 
the Spiders contained in Westring’s work, with the names, both generic and 
specific, which are determined to have priorit}’^, contained in a parallel column. 
To this succeeds, pp. 414-470, synonymic remarks on Spiders described in 
Blackwall’s ‘ History of the Spiders of Great Britain and Ireland ; ’ ” and at 
pp. 471-493 is a list of the Spiders described and figured ” in that history. 
This list is exceedingly useful, containing paginal references to Blackwall’s 
work, and also to the author’s present and former work on European Spiders, 
together with the name, both generic and specific, considered in onch case 
to have the priority, with tho date of fho same. 
The third division of the work occupies pp. 494-644, and is headed Syno- 
nymic remarks on some Spiders included in Simon’s * Catalogue Synony- 
mique des Araneides d’Europe.’ ” For the most part the Spiders here re- 
marked upon are those European ones not included in either Westring’s or 
Blackwall’s work. Pp. 644-607 (concluding the work) are occupied with 
additions and corrections,” forming an exceedingly important part of it, and 
p 2 
