LIST OF PUBLICATIONS. 
233 
otlier than new species. The accustomed indications of novelty are but 
seldom given, though, from the unusual length and detail of some descrip- 
tions, there can be no doubt that certain species not absolutely referred to 
as new are really intended to be published as such. Several others, 
and some genera mentioned, may also be intended to be published as new. 
PiccioLi, Feruinando. Catalogo sinonimico e topografico dei 
Coleotteri della Toscana. Bull. Ent. Ital. iv. pp. 259-272- 
In this fourth year of its continuation, this list (compiled with the help of 
Bargagli) reaches to the end of the Carahidcc, 
Heiciie, L. Catalogue dcs Col^opteres de L^Alg^iie ct contrecs 
voisincs, avcc description d^especes nouvelles : p]>. 41. ]Cx- 
tracted from Mem. Soc. L. Norm. (2) xv. (bearing date 
1869) : published in 1872. 
This part comprises from the Cicindelidee to the Staphylinidee inclusively. 
Several species, which must of course be considered as dating from 1872, are 
described (by Beiche, Pandelle, and Fauvel) in the notes ; and some 
changes of nomenclature are proposed ; for comments on which, and a 
general review of the work, see 0. II. x. p. 230, and Nouv. etFaits, p. cxxxiii 
(July, 1872). The author acknowledges the assistance of MM. Lallemant 
and Fauvel ; the portion relating to the Brachelytra being apparently entirely 
attributable to the latter. 
Seidlitz, Georg. Fauna Baltica. Die Kafer (Coleoptera) der 
Ostseeprovinzen Russlands. Dorpat : 1872, 8vo : Liefe- 
rung 1, table of families, pp. 1-24 (table of genera), pp. ]- 
128; Lief. ii. p. i-xx (introductory chapter on external 
anatomy, collecting, &c.), pp. 25-48 (table of genera), 
pp. 129-208, one plate. 
Reviewed by v. Harold in C. II. x., by Kiesenwetter & Kraatz, B. E. Z. 
xvi. pp. 239 & 240, and by J. Faust, Ilor. Ent, Ross, viii.. Rev. Bibl. p. x. 
The work is on the same dichotomous scheme as Redtenbacher’s well- 
known ‘Fauna Austriaca,’ rendered more difficult to follow by the copious 
use of abbreviations and symbols. Species likely to occur in the distiict 
are described, in different type. The following is the list (in order) 
, of families employed and now discussed by the author : — (Leif, i.) Cara- 
bicidoe [sjc], Bytiscidm, Gyrinidre, Palpicornia, Ileteroceridae, Parnidcc, 
Georyssida?, Lucanidne, Scarabseidre, Buprestida), Euenemidee, Elateridjc, 
Bermestidje, Byrrhidse, (Lief, ii.) Histeridae, Micropeplidae, Nitidulida?, 
Peltidae, Byturidae, Mycetophagidae, Phalacridae, Rhysodidae, Oucujidao (in- 
cluding llypocoprus and Lyctus), Colydiidae (including Monotoma^ Lathridius^ 
Corticaria, Symbiotes, Mycctcea, Alexia, Leiestes, Myrmecoxenus, and Mur- 
midius, from which Ceuthoccrus advena is supposed to be distinct, &c.), 
Oryptophagidae (including Aspidophorus, Enyis, and Sphindus), Cissidae, 
Telmatophilidae (consisting of Diphyllus, Diplocedus, Psammoechus, and 
Telmatojdiilm), Erotylidae, Endomychidae, Coccinellidae, Corylophidae, Tii- 
chopterygidae, Scaphidiidae, Sphaeriidae, Clambidae, Anisotomidae. From the 
table, it is evident that the work will be continued thus : — Silphidae, Scyd- 
maenidae, Paussidae, Pselaphidae, Staphylinidae, Malacodermata, and Tere- 
