CARAIHD/T?. 
239 
Cychrides. 
Damnster Icwisi, sp. ii., Rye, Eiit. M. M. ix. p. 131, Nipoii and Kiushiu, 
Japan. 
Cychnis costa, sp. n., Emery, Bull. Ent. Ital. iv. p. 166, pi. 2. fig. 1, 
Naples. 
Odontacanthides, 
Hojnethes, Newm. ; Cliaiidoir, Bull. Mosc, xlv. 1, p. 387 (adopting Gemm. & 
V. Harold’s correction of Uomothes), removes this genus from the neiglihour- 
liood of Cj/mmdis to that of Stenochila, on account of the outer loho of its 
internally ciliated maxilloo being non-articulato, its palpi, mandibles, and 
tarsi slender, the structure of its ligula, &c. 
Casnonia hcBrnorrhoidaUs, Mots., is described from Tranquebar examples of 
fuscipennis, Chaud., and is apparently a good species ; Od\ont]acantha Utura, 
Schm.-G., is a Casnonia ; C. picta, var. n. sutitralis, United States, p. 406 ; 
C. clarencii, Cast., = australis, Chaud., = alima, Base., and forms a separate 
section; C. ohscura, Cast., and O. micans, Mad., are probably identical; C. 
incerta, G\sQ.\xd..,=geniculata, Gory; Apiodera longicollis, Mots.,= C. hrevi- 
pennis, Chaud. ; C. marginestriata, Putz., redescribed ; Laclinothorax, Mots., 
is only a section of the genus : id. 1. c. p. 404 et scq. 
Stenidia, characterized by its ligula : id. 1. c. p. 409. 
Homothes emarginatus, sp. n., id. 1. c. p. 389, Melbourne. 
Casnonia anescetis, p. 398, Cantagallo, iimhrigera, ibid., liodiscus, lignata, 
p. 399, Rio Janeiro, rudis, Ega, punctatostriata, Cayenne, p. 400, santarema, 
p. 401, Santarem, hivittis, p. 402, Mexico, virgidifera, p. 403, Siam, latifascia, 
p. 404, East Indies : id. 1. c., spp. nn. 
Od[ont]acantha ftdvipennis, p. 407, Celebes, apicalis, p. 408, Bangkok, Sin- 
gapore : id. 1. c., spp. nn. 
Stenidia quadricollis, sp. n., id. 1. c. p. 410, Lake N’gami. 
Anchonoderides. 
Callistus. Chaudoir, 1. c. p. 384, defends his former opinion that this genus 
and its allies approach Anchonoderus more than Chlmnixis. If separated from 
the present group, Callistus, Callistomimus (infra), and CallistocJirous, Chaud. 
(typo 2'etragonodcrus haxi. Gory, from Senegal), should form a fresh one, 
under the name Callistidcs. Callistochrous (Bull. Mosc. 1850) is practically 
recharacterized (pp. 386 & 386), and stated to form a transition to Campto- 
toma, Reiche, also recharacterized, which may also form a transitional group 
between the proposed Callistides and the Lachnophorides. 
Ega. Striation of elytra the best diagnostic character. E. hrasiliensis. 
Mots., ?=?on^^ce^5, Schaum. The known species are briefly referred to, — 
amazonica (p. 394), from Ega, and sulcipcnnis (ibid.) and ohliqua (p. 395), 
front Rio Janeiro, being named (not described) as new. E. ? angusticollis, 
Montrouz., is a Bembidiid, near Tacky s. Steleodera (Selina, Mots.) wester-- 
manni is generically quite distinct from Ega. Id. 1. c. p. 392 et scq. 
Chalyhe. C. Icpricuri, Cast., occurs in the Amazon district, and C. hasalis, 
H. W. Bates, is queried as a var. of it ; C. inaqualis, Bates, is doubted 
as identical with Brulle’s species of that name (grata, Mots., jmncticolHs. 
Laf.) : id. 1. c. p. 396. 
R 2 
