106 Moll 
MOLLUSCOIDEA. 
KirChenpauer, — . Ueber die Bryozoengattung Adeona. Abb. Ver. 
Hamb. vii, pp. 1-24, pis. i.-iii. 
Langeriians, P. Ueber Madeira’s Appendicularien, Z. wiss. Zool. 
xxxiv. pp. 144-146, pi. vi. 
Nicholson, H. Alleyne. On the minute structure of the vQc , e\ii Hetero- 
•pora neozelanicay and of the relations of the genus Heteropora to 
Monticulipora, Ann. N. H. (5) vi. pp. 329-339, & 414-423, with 
woodcuts. 
CEhlert, D. La position systematique des Brachiopodes, d’apres los 
travaux de M. Morse. J. de Conch, xxviii. pp. 109-135. 
Keiniiard, W. Zur Kenntniss der Siisswasser-Bryozoen. Zool. Anz. 
iii. pp. 208-212. 
Repiaciioff, W. On the morphology of the Bryozoa [in Russian, from 
M6m. Soc. Nouv. Russ. vi.]. Odessa: 1880, 69 pp. 4 pis. 
. Zur Kenntniss der Bowerhanhia-lav'^vi. Zool. Anz. iii. p. 260. 
Traustedt, M. Oversigt over de fra Danmark og dets nordlike Bilande 
kjendte Ascidioe simplices. [Review of the known simple Ascidians 
from Denmark and its northern dependencies.] Vid. Medd. 1879-80, 
pp. 397-443. 
Waters, A. W. The use of the Opercula in the determination of the 
Cheilostomatous Bryozoa. P. Soc. Manch. xviii. [1878-79] pp. 8-11. 
Wilson, J. B. New Genus of Polyzoa. J. Micr. Soc. Victoria, i. pp. 
64 & 65, with 1 pi. Abstract in J. R. Micr. Soc. iii. p. 774. 
Woods, J. E. Tenison. On the genus Amathia, with description of a 
new species. Tr. R. Soc. Viet. xvi. 
. On some recent and fossil species of Australian Selenariadce. Tr, 
Phil. Soc. Adelaide, 1880, 
BRACHIOPODA. 
Full abstracts of E. Morse’s and W. Dali’s contradictory papers on the 
systematic position of the Brachiopods [Zool. Rec. xi. p. 194, vii. p. 182, 
xi. p. 176], in French, by D. CEhlert, J. de Conch, xxviii. pp. 109-135, 
& 216-234. 
P. Fischer thinks that the Tim/cnto, the Brachioptoda^ and i\iQ Bryozoa 
(^Polyzoa) form each a distinct primary division of the Malacozoaria, 
each equivalent to the Mollusca proper, and that they cannot be united 
into a common group Molluscoidea ; J. de Conch, xxviii. p. 238. 
L. Joliet, from a discussion of Brooks’s observations on the develop- 
ment of Lingula, comes to the conclusion that the Brachiopods may bo 
taken to be the most highly specialized representatives of the Bryozoan 
branch, and nearer to them than to the true Mollusca. Arch. Z. exper. 
1880, p. 390. Abstract in J. R. Micr. Soc. iii. p. 772. 
F. Balfour discusses the development of the Brachiopoda, in his 
treatise on comparative embryology. London : 1880, vol. i. pp. 257-263. 
