20 
THE ROTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
arrived there. No one would place my extreme specimens of the 
alleged hybrid under any one type. I have practically no doubt that 
they are all either primary or secondary hybrids between two very 
distinct species; being only present where these grow together, and 
forming nearly a complete series between them. The same phenomena 
are likely to occur in Sweden. Unfortunately, I have hitherto been 
unable to consult the national Herbaria as recommended.” — Ed. 
Primula scotica, Hooker. Coast near Black Craig, Mainland, 
Orkney, July i8th, 1900. — W. A. Shoolbred. 
Anchusa officinalis, L. ^^'aste ground, where limestone from 
Plymouth is often deposited for the kiln, Longfleet, towards Parkstone, 
Dorset, 31st August 1901. I saw only one large, fine plant, and, as 
the species has not caught my attention in the cottage gardens (of which 
none are clo.se, but there are plenty about), I cannot say how it came 
there. I have not seen it growing sporite before. — E. E. Linton. 
A. officinalis, L. Aberdare, v.-c. 41, Glamorgan, 1901. — H. J. 
Riddei.sdki.i.. “yL iialica, 1 .,., not A. officinalis, which has broader 
leaves and calyx less deeply divided, with shorter segments.” — E. k'. 
I .inton. 
Myosotis versicolor, Reichb. Near Hirwain, June 1901. Seems to 
be a new record for v.-c. 41, Glamorgan. — H. J. Riodelsdei.l. “ Yes; 
N. C. R.” — Ar. Bennett. 
Linaria purpurea, L. On dry banks on the cross-road between 
the Rafford Road and the Elgin Road, Forres, north-west Elginshire, 
2Slh June 1901. — Charles Bailey. “Surely not that species? 
Were it in the south, I should suggest vulgaris x repensP — Ar. 
Bennett. “Z. repens, Mill., a form with rather a shorter spur than the 
usual form ; exactly like specimens gathered on old ballast heaps near 
the docks, Swansea The flowers are not too large for a 
Z. repens x vulgaris — I have them larger, i.e., nearer vulgaris — but 
the spur in the hybrid is long-acuminate, always borrowing largely 
from Z. vulgaris, whereas in the plant in question the spur is of the 
bluntest description permissible in Z. repens-, usually it is more acute 
or acuminate.” — E. E. Linton. 
Z. repens x vulgaris {teste Ar. Bennett). In good quantity on the 
wall of Llandovery Churchyard, Carmarthenshire, June 1901.^ — W. H. 
Painter. 
Limosella tenuifolia, Hoffm. Wet, sandy shore of Kenfig Pool, 
v.-c. 41, Glamorgan; in profusion for two or three hundred yards 
June 7th and July 12th, 1901. — Edward S. IMarshall and W. A. 
Shoolbred. “A very minute and delicate plant, which I believe to 
be specifically distinct from Z. aquatica, L.” — Ed. 
Veronica Tournefortii, C. Gmel. Rough land on the road from the 
shore at Stonehaven northwards to Nctherley, norlh-east Kincardine- 
