REPORT FOR 190I. 
17 
send more, but the plant has a very restricted range upon Craig 
Breidden, and is much less abundant than H. lasiophyllum^ Koch. — 
Augustin Ley. 
Hieracium Somerfeltii, var. splendens, F. J. Hanb. Origin, Nant 
Francon, Carnarvonshire; cultivated, 1893-8.— W. R. Linton. 
H. orimeles, W. R. Linton. Nant Francon and Cwm Idwal, Car- 
narvonshire, 15 th and 1 6th August 1900. — W. R. Linton. 
II. hypochocroides., Gibs. Cefn-fedw, near Llangollen, Denbigh- 
shire, 25th June 1901. Seen by Mr. Hanbury. — Augustin Ley. 
“ Beautifully prepared ; exactly like the Settle plant.” — Ed. 
II . Pictorum, Linton. Luib and Killin, Mid-Perth, July 1894, 
and cultiYated (from Craig Magriannich, Killin), June 1897. — W. R. 
Linton. 
H. britannicum, F. J. Flanb. Great Orme’s Plead, Carnarvon, 22nd 
June 1901. Exceptionally robust on the sea-cliffs. Name confirmed 
by Mr. Hanbury. — Augustin Ley. “This is, I think, the plant that 
has been colloquially known as ‘cabbagy II. cccsium,^ which was placed 
with doubt under that species. It has somewhat similar foliage to 
II. britannicum, but its phyllaries are not so attenuate as in that 
species, nor nearly so hairy ; and, whereas H. britannicum has very 
hairy phyllaries with few setie buried among the white-tipped hairs, 
and also hairy peduncles with setie, this plant has chiefiy setre on both 
peduncles and phyllaries, with Yery few sparse hairs.” — E. F. Linton. 
“//! ccesiutn, as understood by Elfstrand, has root-leaYCs narrowed into 
the [letiole ; in the present plant they are abruptly truncate and very 
broad-based, recalling those of II. stenolepis. Would not the situation 
modify the clothing of the heads?” — Ed. 
II. rivale, F. J. Hanb. From two stations near Killin, Mid-Perth, 
July 1894: and cultivated from a third, June 1896-7. — W. R. Linton. 
II. tnuroncm, L., \:\r. pu/cherrimum, F. J. Hanb.? Taren-yr-Esgob, 
Breconshire, 4th July 1901. 'I'his is not exactly Mr. Hanbury’s variety, 
as represented by the Carnarvonshire plants from which it was originally 
described, but may be placed under it more conveniently than under 
any other named variety. See his note on the same plant in ‘ Bot. 
Exch.Club Rep.,’ 1897, p. 554(specimens from Crickhowell, Brecon).— 
Augustin Ley. “ Rev. E. F. Linton expresses doubt, but gives no 
other name for it.” — Ed. ' 
H. murorum., var. microcladium, Dahlst. {fide F. J. Hanbury). 
Rocks by the river, Tollymore Park, Co. Down, June i8th, 1901. 
Styles livid. — C. H. Waddell. “ Exactly like the N. Scotch form ; 
excellent material.” — Ed. 
H. mtironwi^ var. pelliicidum^ Lasst. {teste Ley). Near Stroud, v.-c. 
33, E. Gloucestershire; Llwydcoed, Abernant, Aberdare, v.-c. 41, 
