163 
REPORT FOR I905. 
(23) 
R. leucandrus^ Focke. Coll. H. Fisher, comm. W. M. Rogers, 
June — Aug. 1905. Two forms (both fairly frequent in East Dorset 
and S.W. Hants, and both thus named in the living bushes by 
Dr. Focke) are here represented, i. The more frequent ; with 
roundish Its. dark green above, diffuse irregular panicle and large 
flowers. West Cliff, Carbery, and Queen’s Park, Bournemouth; 
Bransgore and Tuckton, S. Hants. 2. With longer, paler oval Its. 
more pyramidal though still irregular panicle and smaller flrs. (more 
or less pinkish), Carbery, S. Hants. This form (in Its. and outline 
of panicle at least) seems the nearer to the ordinary German form, 
if not identical with it.: — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. ramosus, Briggs. Littleworth Common, Surrey, 30th July 
1 905. This bramble is plentiful at the south end of Littleworth 
Common, and is also to be found on several other commons in this 
neighbourhood. The Rev. W. M. Rogers, who identified the plant 
in 1903, expressed the opinion that it was “a stout and less strag- 
gling form than the Devon type, and going off towards R. inacrosfe- 
mon, Focke.” — C. E. Britton. 
R. Godroniy var. robustus, P. J. Muell. Several bushes about 
Abernant Park, Aberdare, Aug. 1905. Named by Mr. Rogers. 
New record for the county of Glamorgan. — FI. J. Riddelsdell. 
R. lenttginosHs, Lees. Putney Heath, Surrey, 20th July 1905. 
I understand that Mr. Rogers only provisionally applies the above 
name to this well-marked form, which also occurs to my knowledge 
in W. Kent and S. Essex. A minor character of the pi. of these 
localities is the often extreme foliar development of the sepals. — 
C. E. Britton. 
R. hypoleticus, Lef. & Muell. (formerly R. micans, Gren. & 
Godr.). From various spots in the county of Glamorgan, 1905. 
Until now unrecorded for v.-c. 41. Mr. Rogers has seen the 
gatherings. — H. J. Riddelsdell. 
R. leucostachys, Schleich., forma? (towards pulcherrimus and 
rhamnifolius). Iford to Tuckton, Hants S., fl. 3rd July; fr. 9th 
Aug. 1905 ; H. Fisher. A strongly marked form with less densely 
hairy stem, weaker prickles, and larger flowers than are usual in 
R. leucostac/iys. A similar, if not identical, plant is abundant in 
Co. Down and E. Armagh, where after some hesitation I placed 
it under R. leucostachys in 1901 ; but for dried Co. Down speci- 
mens of this I hear from the Rev. C. H. Waddell that Dr. Focke 
has now suggested the (to me unknown) name, R. andegavensis , — 
W. Moyle Rogers. 
